OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis is to present incidence rates of exposure to blood among paramedics in the United States by selected variables and to compare all percutaneous exposure rates among different types of healthcare workers. METHODS: A survey on blood exposure was mailed in 2002-2003 to a national sample of paramedics. Results for California paramedics were analyzed with the national sample and also separately. RESULTS: The incidence rate for needlestick/lancet injuries was 100/1,000 employee-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 40-159] among the national sample and 26/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 15-38) for the California sample. The highest exposure rate was for non-intact skin, 230/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 130-329). The rate for all exposures was 465/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 293-637). California needlestick/lancet rates, but not national, were substantially lower than rates in earlier studies of paramedics. Rates for all percutaneous injuries among paramedics were similar to the mid to high range of rates reported for most hospital-based healthcare workers. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics in the United States are experiencing percutaneous injury rates at least as high as, and possibly substantially higher than, most hospital-based healthcare workers, as well as substantially higher rates of exposure to blood on non-intact skin.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis is to present incidence rates of exposure to blood among paramedics in the United States by selected variables and to compare all percutaneous exposure rates among different types of healthcare workers. METHODS: A survey on blood exposure was mailed in 2002-2003 to a national sample of paramedics. Results for California paramedics were analyzed with the national sample and also separately. RESULTS: The incidence rate for needlestick/lancet injuries was 100/1,000 employee-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 40-159] among the national sample and 26/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 15-38) for the California sample. The highest exposure rate was for non-intact skin, 230/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 130-329). The rate for all exposures was 465/1,000 employee-years (95% CI, 293-637). California needlestick/lancet rates, but not national, were substantially lower than rates in earlier studies of paramedics. Rates for all percutaneous injuries among paramedics were similar to the mid to high range of rates reported for most hospital-based healthcare workers. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics in the United States are experiencing percutaneous injury rates at least as high as, and possibly substantially higher than, most hospital-based healthcare workers, as well as substantially higher rates of exposure to blood on non-intact skin.
Authors: Rahel Mathews; Jack K Leiss; Jennifer T Lyden; Sara Sousa; Jennifer M Ratcliffe; Janine Jagger Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2008-10-03 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Najib T Ayas; Laura K Barger; Brian E Cade; Dean M Hashimoto; Bernard Rosner; John W Cronin; Frank E Speizer; Charles A Czeisler Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-09-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A B Zafar; R C Butler; J M Podgorny; P A Mennonna; L A Gaydos; J A Sandiford Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Robyn R M Gershon; Martin Sherman; Clifford Mitchell; David Vlahov; Melissa J Erwin; Mary Kathleen Lears; Sarah Felknor; Rebecca A Lubelczyk; Miriam J Alter Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2006-12-29 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Robyn R M Gershon; Kristine A Qureshi; Monika Pogorzelska; Jonathan Rosen; Kristine M Gebbie; Paul W Brandt-Rauf; Martin F Sherman Journal: Ind Health Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Matthew D Weaver; P Daniel Patterson; Anthony Fabio; Charity G Moore; Matthew S Freiberg; Thomas J Songer Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Matthew D Weaver; P Daniel Patterson; Anthony Fabio; Charity G Moore; Matthew S Freiberg; Thomas J Songer Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-09-14 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: P Daniel Patterson; Matthew D Weaver; Douglas P Landsittel; David Krackhardt; David Hostler; John E Vena; Ashley M Hughes; Eduardo Salas; Donald M Yealy Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2015-11-27 Impact factor: 2.740