Literature DB >> 15301024

Effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology.

SeJean Sohn1, Janet Eagan, Kent A Sepkowitz, Gianna Zuccotti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology, specifically on percutaneous injuries associated with a higher risk of blood-borne pathogen exposure.
DESIGN: Before-and-after intervention trial comparing 3-year preintervention (1998--2000) and 1-year postintervention (2001--2002) periods. Percutaneous injury data have been entered prospectively into CDC NaSH software since 1998.
SETTING: A 427-bed, tertiary-care hospital in Manhattan. PARTICIPANTS: All employees who reported percutaneous injuries during the study period. INTERVENTION: A "safer-needle system," composed of a variety of safety-engineered devices to allow for needle-safe IV delivery, blood collection, IV insertion, and intramuscular and subcutaneous injection, was implemented in February 2001.
RESULTS: The mean annual incidence of percutaneous injuries decreased from 34.08 per 1,000 full-time-equivalent employees preintervention to 14.25 postintervention (P < .001). Reductions in the average monthly number of percutaneous injuries resulting from both low-risk (P < .01) and high-risk (P was not significant) activities were observed. Nurses experienced the greatest decrease (74.5%, P < .001), followed by ancillary staff (61.5%, P = .03). Significant rate reductions were observed for the following activities: manipulating patients or sharps (83.5%, P < .001), collisions or contact with sharps (73.0%, P = .01), disposal-related injuries (21.41%, P = .001), and catheter insertions (88.2%, P < .001). Injury rates involving hollow-bore needles also decreased (70.6%, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of safety-engineered devices reduced percutaneous injury rates across occupations, activities, times of injury, and devices. Moreover, intervention impact was observed when stratified by risk for blood-borne pathogen transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15301024     DOI: 10.1086/502436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  8 in total

1.  epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.

Authors:  H P Loveday; J A Wilson; R J Pratt; M Golsorkhi; A Tingle; A Bak; J Browne; J Prieto; M Wilcox
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  epic2: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England.

Authors:  R J Pratt; C M Pellowe; J A Wilson; H P Loveday; P J Harper; S R L J Jones; C McDougall; M H Wilcox
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  The national study to prevent blood exposure in paramedics: rates of exposure to blood.

Authors:  Winifred L Boal; Jack K Leiss; Jennifer M Ratcliffe; Sara Sousa; Jennifer T Lyden; Jia Li; Janine Jagger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Safety engineered injection devices for intramuscular, subcutaneous and intradermal injections in healthcare delivery settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alain C Harb; Rami Tarabay; Batoul Diab; Rami A Ballout; Selma Khamassi; Elie A Akl
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2015-12-30

5.  Risk Reduction of Needle Stick Injuries Due to Continuous Shift from Unsafe to Safe Instruments at a German University Hospital.

Authors:  Hagen Frickmann; Wibke Schmeja; Emil Reisinger; Thomas Mittlmeier; Karen Mitzner; Norbert Georg Schwarz; Philipp Warnke; Andreas Podbielski
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2016-08-23

6.  Investigation of a safety-engineered device to prevent needlestick injury: why has not StatLock stuck?

Authors:  Sharon Griswold; Alisha Bonaroti; Christopher J Rieder; John Erbayri; Jessica Parsons; Romy Nocera; Richard Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rami A Ballout; Batoul Diab; Alain C Harb; Rami Tarabay; Selma Khamassi; Elie A Akl
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Ottino; Andrea Argentero; Pier Angelo Argentero; Giacomo Garzaro; Carla Maria Zotti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.