Literature DB >> 19435929

The relative potency of inverse opioid agonists and a neutral opioid antagonist in precipitated withdrawal and antagonism of analgesia and toxicity.

Sunil Sirohi1, Shveta V Dighe, Priyanka A Madia, Byron C Yoburn.   

Abstract

Opioid antagonists can be classified as inverse agonists and neutral antagonists. In the opioid-dependent state, neutral antagonists are significantly less potent in precipitating withdrawal than inverse agonists. Consequently, neutral opioid antagonists may offer advantages over inverse agonists in the management of opioid overdose. In this study, the relative potency of three opioid antagonists to block opioid analgesia and toxicity and precipitate withdrawal was examined. First, the potency of two opioid inverse agonists (naltrexone and naloxone) and a neutral antagonist (6beta-naltrexol) to antagonize fentanyl-induced analgesia and lethality was determined. The order of potency to block analgesia was naltrexone > naloxone > 6beta-naltrexol (17, 4, 1), which was similar to that to block lethality (13, 2, 1). Next, the antagonists were compared using withdrawal jumping in fentanyl-dependent mice. The order of potency to precipitate withdrawal jumping was naltrexone > naloxone 6beta-naltrexol (1107, 415, 1). The relative potencies to precipitate withdrawal for the inverse agonists compared with the neutral antagonist were dramatically different from that for antagonism of analgesia and lethality. Finally, the effect of 6beta-naltrexol pretreatment on naloxone-precipitated jumping was determined in morphine and fentanyl-dependent mice. 6beta-Naltrexol pretreatment decreased naloxone precipitated withdrawal, indicating that 6beta-naltrexol is a neutral antagonist. These data demonstrate that inverse agonists and neutral antagonists have generally comparable potencies to block opioid analgesia and lethality, whereas the neutral opioid antagonist is substantially less potent in precipitating opioid withdrawal. These results support suggestions that neutral antagonists may have advantages over inverse agonists in the management of opioid overdose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19435929      PMCID: PMC2713087          DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.152678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  26 in total

Review 1.  Naloxone in opioid poisoning: walking the tightrope.

Authors:  S F J Clarke; P I Dargan; A L Jones
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Functional selectivity and classical concepts of quantitative pharmacology.

Authors:  Jonathan D Urban; William P Clarke; Mark von Zastrow; David E Nichols; Brian Kobilka; Harel Weinstein; Jonathan A Javitch; Bryan L Roth; Arthur Christopoulos; Patrick M Sexton; Keith J Miller; Michael Spedding; Richard B Mailman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  In vivo characterization of 6beta-naltrexol, an opioid ligand with less inverse agonist activity compared with naltrexone and naloxone in opioid-dependent mice.

Authors:  Kirsten M Raehal; John J Lowery; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; Ryan M Paolino; Jennifer R Blair; Danxin Wang; Wolfgang Sadée; Edward J Bilsky
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Differential in vivo potencies of naltrexone and 6beta-naltrexol in the monkey.

Authors:  M C Holden Ko; Mary F Divin; Heeseung Lee; James H Woods; John R Traynor
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Different effects of opioid antagonists on mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors with and without agonist pretreatment.

Authors:  Danxin Wang; Xiaochun Sun; Wolfgang Sadee
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Opioid antagonists differ according to negative intrinsic efficacy in a mouse model of acute dependence.

Authors:  Ellen A Walker; Steven N Sterious
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Comparison of naltrexone, 6alpha-naltrexol, and 6beta-naltrexol in morphine-dependent and in nondependent rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Jun-Xu Li; Lance R McMahon; Charles P France
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-09-16       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Naloxone treatment in opioid addiction: the risks and benefits.

Authors:  Eveline L A van Dorp; Ashraf Yassen; Albert Dahan
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.250

9.  [N-allyl-Dmt1]-endomorphins are micro-opioid receptor antagonists lacking inverse agonist properties.

Authors:  Ewa D Marczak; Yunden Jinsmaa; Tingyou Li; Sharon D Bryant; Yuko Tsuda; Yoshio Okada; Lawrence H Lazarus
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Mu-opioid receptor up-regulation and functional supersensitivity are independent of antagonist efficacy.

Authors:  Sunil Sirohi; Priyank Kumar; Byron C Yoburn
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  16 in total

1.  The role of opioid antagonist efficacy and constitutive opioid receptor activity in the opioid withdrawal syndrome in mice.

Authors:  Dipesh M Navani; Sunil Sirohi; Priyanka A Madia; Byron C Yoburn
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Constitutive μ-opioid receptor activity leads to long-term endogenous analgesia and dependence.

Authors:  G Corder; S Doolen; R R Donahue; M K Winter; B L Jutras; Y He; X Hu; J S Wieskopf; J S Mogil; D R Storm; Z J Wang; K E McCarson; B K Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Lack of Antinociceptive Cross-Tolerance With Co-Administration of Morphine and Fentanyl Into the Periaqueductal Gray of Male Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Erin N Bobeck; Shauna M Schoo; Susan L Ingram; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  In vivo characterization of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in mice.

Authors:  Melissa D Osborn; John J Lowery; Alex G J Skorput; Denise Giuvelis; Edward J Bilsky
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 5.037

5.  Differential development of antinociceptive tolerance to morphine and fentanyl is not linked to efficacy in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray of the rat.

Authors:  Erin N Bobeck; Rachel A Haseman; Dana Hong; Susan L Ingram; Michael M Morgan
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Constitutive Desensitization of Opioid Receptors in Peripheral Sensory Neurons.

Authors:  Laura C Sullivan; Teresa S Chavera; Raehannah J Jamshidi; Kelly A Berg; William P Clarke
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  The one-two punch of alcoholism: role of central amygdala dynorphins/kappa-opioid receptors.

Authors:  Jessica L Kissler; Sunil Sirohi; Daniel J Reis; Heiko T Jansen; Raymond M Quock; Daniel G Smith; Brendan M Walker
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Maturational alterations in constitutive activity of medial prefrontal cortex kappa-opioid receptors in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Sunil Sirohi; Brendan M Walker
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.372

9.  Preferential Delivery of an Opioid Antagonist to the Fetal Brain in Pregnant Mice.

Authors:  John Oberdick; Yonghua Ling; Mitch A Phelps; Max S Yudovich; Karl Schilling; Wolfgang Sadee
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Species differences in the effects of the κ-opioid receptor antagonist zyklophin.

Authors:  Sunil Sirohi; Jane V Aldrich; Brendan M Walker
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.