Literature DB >> 20159022

In vivo characterization of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in mice.

Melissa D Osborn1, John J Lowery, Alex G J Skorput, Denise Giuvelis, Edward J Bilsky.   

Abstract

AIMS: The current study assessed the in vivo antagonist properties of nalmefene using procedures previously used to characterize the opioid antagonists naloxone, naltrexone, 6beta-naltrexol and nalbuphine. MAIN
METHODS: ICR mice were used to generate antagonist dose-response curves with intraperitoneal (i.p.) nalmefene against fixed A(90) doses of morphine in models of morphine-stimulated hyperlocomotion and antinociception. Additional dose-response curves for antagonist precipitated opioid withdrawal were run in mice treated acutely (100mg/kg, s.c., -4h) or chronically (75mg pellet, s.c., -72h) with morphine. Comparisons were made between antagonist potency and degree of precipitated withdrawal. KEY
FINDINGS: Nalmefene produced dose- and time-related antagonism of morphine-induced increases in locomotor activity with a calculated ID(50) (and 95% confidence interval) of 0.014 (0.007-0.027)mg/kg. Nalmefene produced rapid reversal of morphine-induced locomotor activity (5.1min for 50% reduction in morphine effect). A 0.32mg/kg dose of nalmefene produced blockade of morphine-induced antinociception in the 55 degrees C tail-flick test that lasted approximately 2h. Nalmefene was able to potently precipitate withdrawal in mice treated acutely or chronically with morphine. SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate that nalmefene is similar to naloxone and naltrexone with respect to its in vivo pharmacology in mice. Specifically, nalmefene produces potent antagonism of morphine agonist effects while precipitating severe withdrawal. The compound has a slower onset and longer duration of action compared to naloxone and naltrexone. The data allows for a more complete preclinical comparison of nalmefene against other opioid antagonists including the putative opioid neutral antagonist 6beta-naltrexol. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20159022      PMCID: PMC2848904          DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2010.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci        ISSN: 0024-3205            Impact factor:   5.037


  21 in total

1.  Pharmacological control of opioid-induced pruritus: a quantitative systematic review of randomized trials.

Authors:  F Kjellberg; M R Tramèr
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Narcotic antagonist activity of several metabolites of naloxone and naltrexone tested in morphine dependent mice (38558).

Authors:  J M Fujimoto; S Roerig; R I Wang; N Chatterjie; C E Inturrisi
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1975-02

3.  The impact of nalmefene on side effects due to intrathecal morphine at cesarean section.

Authors:  J E Pellegrini; S L Bailey; J Graves; J A Paice; S Shott; M Faut-Callahan
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  2001-06

4.  Development of physical dependence on morphine in respect to time and dosage and quantification of the precipitated withdrawal syndrome in rats.

Authors:  J Bläsig; A Herz; K Reinhold; S Zieglgänsberger
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1973-10-23

5.  Naloxone-precipitated withdrawal jumping in 11 inbred mouse strains: evidence for common genetic mechanisms in acute and chronic morphine physical dependence.

Authors:  B Kest; C A Palmese; E Hopkins; M Adler; A Juni; J S Mogil
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Comparison of potency and duration of action of nalmefene and naloxone.

Authors:  P S Glass; R M Jhaveri; L R Smith
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 7.  Nalmefene: a long-acting opioid antagonist. Clinical applications in emergency medicine.

Authors:  D S Wang; G Sternbach; J Varon
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Basal signaling activity of mu opioid receptor in mouse brain: role in narcotic dependence.

Authors:  Danxin Wang; Kirsten M Raehal; Emil T Lin; John J Lowery; Brigitte L Kieffer; Edward J Bilsky; Wolfgang Sadée
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Effects of naloxone and D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 and the protein kinase inhibitors H7 and H8 on acute morphine dependence and antinociceptive tolerance in mice.

Authors:  E J Bilsky; R N Bernstein; Z Wang; W Sadée; F Porreca
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Ligand-specific regulation of the extracellular surface of a G-protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Michael P Bokoch; Yaozhong Zou; Søren G F Rasmussen; Corey W Liu; Rie Nygaard; Daniel M Rosenbaum; Juan José Fung; Hee-Jung Choi; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; Joseph D Puglisi; William I Weis; Leonardo Pardo; R Scott Prosser; Luciano Mueller; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Targeted opioid receptor antagonists in the treatment of alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Mark J Niciu; Albert J Arias
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  [Nalmefene: a novel pharmacotherapeutic option for alcoholism].

Authors:  M Soyka
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 3.  Future pharmacological treatments for substance use disorders.

Authors:  Ariadna Forray; Mehmet Sofuoglu
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Blocking of opioid receptors in experimental formaline-inactivated respiratory syncytial virus (FI-RSV) immunopathogenesis: from beneficial to harmful impacts.

Authors:  Vahid Salimi; Habib Mirzaei; Ali Ramezani; Alireza Tahamtan; Abbas Jamali; Shahram Shahabi; Maryam Golara; Bagher Minaei; Mohammad Javad Gharagozlou; Mahmood Mahmoodi; Louis Bont; Fazel Shokri; Talat Mokhtari-Azad
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Effect of nalmefene 20 and 80 mg on the corrected QT interval and T-wave morphology: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, single-centre study.

Authors:  Jørgen Matz; Claus Graff; Petri J Vainio; Antero Kallio; Astrid Maria Højer; Johannes J Struijk; Jørgen K Kanters; Mads P Andersen; Egon Toft
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Opioid-like adverse effects of tianeptine in male rats and mice.

Authors:  T R Baird; H I Akbarali; W L Dewey; H Elder; M Kang; S A Marsh; M R Peace; J L Poklis; E J Santos; S S Negus
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Role of Efficacy as a Determinant of Locomotor Activation by Mu Opioid Receptor Ligands in Female and Male Mice.

Authors:  Edna J Santos; Matthew L Banks; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Mechanism and Management of Fentanyl-Induced Cough.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Ling-Hua Tang; Tao Sun; Zi Zeng; Yun-Yan Zhang; Ke Ding; Qing-Tao Meng
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.810

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.