AIMS: There are a large number of common genetic variants that have been robustly associated with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride concentrations. The majority of these have been identified or confirmed in recent genome-wide association studies, but few studies have assessed the combined effect of known lipid variants. We hypothesized that these variants would influence both the need for interventions and myocardial infarction (MI) outcomes. We aimed to estimate combined effects of proven SNPs on LDL, HDL, and triglyceride concentrations and MI history in a representative older population. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the InCHIANTI Study of Aging (age >or=65 years), we calculated individual dyslipidaemia risk allele counts for increased LDL (range 4-14, n = 594), reduced HDL (5-16, n = 635), and increased triglycerides (7-16, n = 611). Lipid levels were compared with ATPIII National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP) intervention guidelines. Individual variants and the APOE haplotype explained <2.1% of the variance in their respective lipid concentrations, with the exception of the CETP SNP rs1800775 and HDL levels (4.76%). Combined risk allele counts outperformed the largest single-SNP effects for LDL (explaining 7.1% of variance) and triglycerides (4.8%), but not HDL (3.4%). Risk alleles were divided as near as possible into quartiles. The 31% of respondents with 10 or more LDL increasing alleles were more likely to have LDL levels above the intervention threshold (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.67-5.39, P = 2.5 x 10(-4)), compared with the 21% with 7 or less risk alleles. Similarly, the 35% with 13 or more triglyceride risk alleles were more likely to exceed NCEP intervention thresholds (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.43-6.22, P = 0.004) compared with the 24% with 10 or less alleles. The number of individuals reporting an MI event was small (n = 67), but an event was more common in the 36% of respondents who had the highest combined risk allele score for all three lipids (OR 3.68, 95% CI 1.21-11.2, P = 0.021) compared with the lowest risk 22%. CONCLUSION: In a representative older population, the cumulative effects of proven LDL- and triglyceride-altering genetic variants increased the odds of crossing the lipid-level threshold for therapeutic intervention by approximately three-fold.
AIMS: There are a large number of common genetic variants that have been robustly associated with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, or triglyceride concentrations. The majority of these have been identified or confirmed in recent genome-wide association studies, but few studies have assessed the combined effect of known lipid variants. We hypothesized that these variants would influence both the need for interventions and myocardial infarction (MI) outcomes. We aimed to estimate combined effects of proven SNPs on LDL, HDL, and triglyceride concentrations and MI history in a representative older population. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the InCHIANTI Study of Aging (age >or=65 years), we calculated individual dyslipidaemia risk allele counts for increased LDL (range 4-14, n = 594), reduced HDL (5-16, n = 635), and increased triglycerides (7-16, n = 611). Lipid levels were compared with ATPIII National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP) intervention guidelines. Individual variants and the APOE haplotype explained <2.1% of the variance in their respective lipid concentrations, with the exception of the CETP SNP rs1800775 and HDL levels (4.76%). Combined risk allele counts outperformed the largest single-SNP effects for LDL (explaining 7.1% of variance) and triglycerides (4.8%), but not HDL (3.4%). Risk alleles were divided as near as possible into quartiles. The 31% of respondents with 10 or more LDL increasing alleles were more likely to have LDL levels above the intervention threshold (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.67-5.39, P = 2.5 x 10(-4)), compared with the 21% with 7 or less risk alleles. Similarly, the 35% with 13 or more triglyceride risk alleles were more likely to exceed NCEP intervention thresholds (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.43-6.22, P = 0.004) compared with the 24% with 10 or less alleles. The number of individuals reporting an MI event was small (n = 67), but an event was more common in the 36% of respondents who had the highest combined risk allele score for all three lipids (OR 3.68, 95% CI 1.21-11.2, P = 0.021) compared with the lowest risk 22%. CONCLUSION: In a representative older population, the cumulative effects of proven LDL- and triglyceride-altering genetic variants increased the odds of crossing the lipid-level threshold for therapeutic intervention by approximately three-fold.
Authors: Philip Barter; Antonio M Gotto; John C LaRosa; Jaman Maroni; Michael Szarek; Scott M Grundy; John J P Kastelein; Vera Bittner; Jean-Charles Fruchart Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chris J Packard; Ian Ford; Michele Robertson; James Shepherd; Gerard J Blauw; Michael B Murphy; Edward L E M Bollen; Brendan M Buckley; Stuart M Cobbe; Allan Gaw; Michael Hyland; J Wouter Jukema; Adriaan M Kamper; Peter W Macfarlane; Ivan J Perry; David J Stott; Brian J Sweeney; Cillian Twomey; Rudi G J Westendorp Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-11-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J W Yarnell; C C Patterson; P M Sweetnam; H F Thomas; D Bainton; P C Elwood; C H Bolton; N E Miller Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: L Ferrucci; S Bandinelli; E Benvenuti; A Di Iorio; C Macchi; T B Harris; J M Guralnik Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Anna M Bennet; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Zheng Ye; Frances Wensley; Anette Dahlin; Anders Ahlbom; Bernard Keavney; Rory Collins; Björn Wiman; Ulf de Faire; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Alexander Thompson; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Nadeem Sarwar; Sebhat Erqou; Danish Saleheen; Robin P F Dullaart; Bernard Keavney; Zheng Ye; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sonia Shah; Juan P Casas; Tom R Gaunt; Jackie Cooper; Fotios Drenos; Delilah Zabaneh; Daniel I Swerdlow; Tina Shah; Reecha Sofat; Jutta Palmen; Meena Kumari; Mika Kivimaki; Shah Ebrahim; George Davey Smith; Debbie A Lawlor; Philippa J Talmud; John Whittaker; Ian N M Day; Aroon D Hingorani; Steve E Humphries Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Li Ma; Jing Yang; H Birali Runesha; Toshiko Tanaka; Luigi Ferrucci; Stefania Bandinelli; Yang Da Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: L C Pilling; L W Harries; J Powell; D J Llewellyn; L Ferrucci; D Melzer Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Robert W Read; Karen A Schlauch; Vincent C Lombardi; Elizabeth T Cirulli; Nicole L Washington; James T Lu; Joseph J Grzymski Journal: Front Genet Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Caitlin Mills; Anushya Muruganujan; Dustin Ebert; Crystal N Marconett; Juan Pablo Lewinger; Paul D Thomas; Huaiyu Mi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 3.240