Literature DB >> 19433691

Adherence to long-term surveillance mammography among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery.

Larissa Nekhlyudov1, Laurel A Habel, Ninah S Achacoso, Inkyung Jung, Reina Haque, Laura C Collins, Stuart J Schnitt, Charles P Quesenberry, Suzanne W Fletcher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is an effective treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) but women who undergo BCS remain at risk for recurrences. Whether mammographic surveillance after BCS occurs and by whom is not known. METHODS We reviewed medical records of women diagnosed with DCIS between 1990 and 2001 and treated with BCS. Using descriptive statistics, generalized estimating, and logistic regression modeling, we examined the rates and predictors of surveillance mammography over a 10-year period after BCS. Results The cohort included 3,037 women observed for a median of 4.8 years (range, 0.5 to 15.7). Of the 2,676 women observed for at least 1 year after BCS, most (79%) had at least one surveillance mammogram during the first year of follow-up; 69% in year 5 and 61% in year 10. Among those observed for 5 years, surveillance mammograms were more likely among women age 60 to 69 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.34), users of menopausal hormone therapy at diagnosis (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.57) as well as those treated with adjuvant radiation (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.53) and adjuvant radiation with tamoxifen (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.30). Surveillance mammograms were less likely among obese women (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.86). The findings were similar among women observed for 10 years. Only 34% and 15% of women observed for 5 and 10 years, respectively, had a surveillance mammogram during each year of follow-up. CONCLUSION Surveillance mammography after BCS among insured women with DCIS often did not occur yearly and declined over time after treatment. Patients and providers must remain vigilant about surveillance after BCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19433691      PMCID: PMC2716942          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.5876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  22 in total

1.  "Well, have I got cancer or haven't I?" The psycho-social issues for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Simone De Morgan; Sally Redman; Kate J White; Burcu Cakir; John Boyages
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Underutilization of mammography in older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  M M Schapira; T L McAuliffe; A B Nattinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting.

Authors:  James L Khatcheressian; Antonio C Wolff; Thomas J Smith; Eva Grunfeld; Hyman B Muss; Victor G Vogel; Francine Halberg; Mark R Somerfield; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Screening for cervical and breast cancer: is obesity an unrecognized barrier to preventive care?

Authors:  C C Wee; E P McCarthy; R B Davis; R S Phillips
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Medical surveillance after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  T L Lash; R A Silliman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988-2001.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Kathleen E Malone; Babette S Saltzman; Janet R Daling
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Mammography screening rates decline: a person-time approach to evaluation.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Thomas M Vogt; Mikel Aickin; Weiming R Hu
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Factors related to underuse of surveillance mammography among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Nancy L Keating; Mary Beth Landrum; Edward Guadagnoli; Eric P Winer; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Mammography surveillance following breast cancer.

Authors:  Berta M Geller; Karla Kerlikowske; Patricia A Carney; Linn A Abraham; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Stephen H Taplin; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Mark B Dignan; Robert Rosenberg; Nicole Urban; William E Barlow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Harold J Burstein; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  9 in total

1.  Use of annual mammography among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Phyllis Brawarsky; Bridget A Neville; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Michael J Hassett; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Cancer research network: using integrated healthcare delivery systems as platforms for cancer survivorship research.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Sarah M Greene; Jessica Chubak; Borsika Rabin; Leah Tuzzio; Sharon Rolnick; Terry S Field
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Annual surveillance mammography after early-stage breast cancer and breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  L F Paszat; R Sutradhar; S Gu; E Rakovitch
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Ten-year risk of diagnostic mammograms and invasive breast procedures after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Laurel A Habel; Ninah Achacoso; Inkyung Jung; Reina Haque; Laura C Collins; Stuart J Schnitt; Charles P Quesenberry; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  The impact of adding radiation treatment after breast conservation surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Lawrence J Solin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 6.  Quality-of-life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

7.  Factors Associated With Underestimation of Invasive Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Precautions for Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Carlos Chavez de Paz Villanueva; Valentina Bonev; Maheswari Senthil; Naveenraj Solomon; Mark E Reeves; Carlos A Garberoglio; Jukes P Namm; Sharon S Lum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): posttreatment follow-up care among Latina and non-Latina White women.

Authors:  Mónica E López; Celia P Kaplan; Anna M Nápoles; Jennifer C Livaudais; E Shelley Hwang; Susan L Stewart; Joan Bloom; Leah Karliner
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 9.  Racial/ethnic disparities in use of surveillance mammogram among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pragati Advani; Shailesh Advani; Pratibha Nayak; Helena M VonVille; Pamela Diamond; Jason Burnett; Abenaa M Brewster; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.442

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.