PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that, with 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) treatment, the co-expression of cytosine deaminase (CD) and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (UPRT) can lead to greater radiosensitization and bystander effect than CD-expression alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: R3327-AT cell lines stably expressing CD or CDUPRT were generated. The 5-FC and 5-FU cytotoxicity, and the radiosensitivity with/without 5-FC treatment, of these cells were evaluated under both aerobic and hypoxic conditions. The bystander effect was assessed by apoptosis staining and clonogenic survival. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and 5-FC metabolism was monitored in mice bearing CD- or CDUPRT-expressing tumors using 19F MR spectroscopy (MRS). RESULTS: CDUPRT-expressing cells were more sensitive to 5-FC and 5-FU than CD-expressing cells. CDUPRT-expression further enhanced the radiosensitizing effect of 5-FC, relative to that achieved by CD-expression alone. A 25-fold lower dose of 5-FC resulted in the same magnitude of radiosensitization in CDUPRT-expressing cells, relative to that in CD-expressing cells. The 5-FC cytotoxicity in co-cultures of parental cells mixed with 10-20% CDUPRT cells was similar to that in 100% CDUPRT cells. 19F MRS measurements showed that expression of CDUPRT leads to enhanced accumulation of fluorine nucleotide (FNuc), relative to that associated with CD-expression alone. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that CDUPRT/5-FC strategy may be more effective than CD/5-FC, especially when used in combination with radiation.
PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that, with 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) treatment, the co-expression of cytosine deaminase (CD) and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (UPRT) can lead to greater radiosensitization and bystander effect than CD-expression alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: R3327-AT cell lines stably expressing CD or CDUPRT were generated. The 5-FC and 5-FUcytotoxicity, and the radiosensitivity with/without 5-FC treatment, of these cells were evaluated under both aerobic and hypoxic conditions. The bystander effect was assessed by apoptosis staining and clonogenic survival. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and 5-FC metabolism was monitored in mice bearing CD- or CDUPRT-expressing tumors using 19F MR spectroscopy (MRS). RESULTS:CDUPRT-expressing cells were more sensitive to 5-FC and 5-FU than CD-expressing cells. CDUPRT-expression further enhanced the radiosensitizing effect of 5-FC, relative to that achieved by CD-expression alone. A 25-fold lower dose of 5-FC resulted in the same magnitude of radiosensitization in CDUPRT-expressing cells, relative to that in CD-expressing cells. The 5-FCcytotoxicity in co-cultures of parental cells mixed with 10-20% CDUPRT cells was similar to that in 100% CDUPRT cells. 19F MRS measurements showed that expression of CDUPRT leads to enhanced accumulation of fluorine nucleotide (FNuc), relative to that associated with CD-expression alone. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that CDUPRT/5-FC strategy may be more effective than CD/5-FC, especially when used in combination with radiation.
Authors: Daniel A Hamstra; Kuei C Lee; Joseph M Tychewicz; Victor D Schepkin; Bradford A Moffat; Mark Chen; Kenneth J Dornfeld; Theodore S Lawrence; Thomas L Chenevert; Brian D Ross; Juri T Gelovani; Alnawaz Rehemtulla Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: E Kievit; M K Nyati; E Ng; L D Stegman; J Parsels; B D Ross; A Rehemtulla; T S Lawrence Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ligang Xing; Xuelong Deng; Khushali Kotedia; Ellen Ackerstaff; Vladimir Ponomarev; C Clifton Ling; Jason A Koutcher; Gloria C Li Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: L Xing; X Sun; X Deng; K Kotedia; P B Zanzonico; E Ackerstaff; J A Koutcher; C C Ling; G C Li Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 5.987