| Literature DB >> 19432659 |
Mona M Baharestani1, Joyce M Black, Keryln Carville, Michael Clark, Janet E Cuddigan, Carol Dealey, Tom Defloor, Keith G Harding, Nils A Lahmann, Maarten J Lubbers, Courtney H Lyder, Takehiko Ohura, Heather L Orsted, Steve I Reger, Marco Romanelli, Hiromi Sanada.
Abstract
Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data are increasingly being used as indicators of quality of care and the efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention protocols. In some health care systems, the occurrence of pressure ulcers is also being linked to reimbursement. The wider use of these epidemiological analyses necessitates that all those involved in pressure ulcer care and prevention have a clear understanding of the definitions and implications of prevalence and incidence rates. In addition, an appreciation of the potential difficulties in conducting prevalence and incidence studies and the possible explanations for differences between studies are important. An international group of experts has worked to produce a consensus document that aims to delineate and discuss the important issues involved, and to provide guidance on approaches to conducting and interpreting pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence studies. The group's main findings are summarised in this paper.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19432659 PMCID: PMC7951416 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00593.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Wound J ISSN: 1742-4801 Impact factor: 3.315