Literature DB >> 19432659

Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence: an international consensus.

Mona M Baharestani1, Joyce M Black, Keryln Carville, Michael Clark, Janet E Cuddigan, Carol Dealey, Tom Defloor, Keith G Harding, Nils A Lahmann, Maarten J Lubbers, Courtney H Lyder, Takehiko Ohura, Heather L Orsted, Steve I Reger, Marco Romanelli, Hiromi Sanada.   

Abstract

Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data are increasingly being used as indicators of quality of care and the efficacy of pressure ulcer prevention protocols. In some health care systems, the occurrence of pressure ulcers is also being linked to reimbursement. The wider use of these epidemiological analyses necessitates that all those involved in pressure ulcer care and prevention have a clear understanding of the definitions and implications of prevalence and incidence rates. In addition, an appreciation of the potential difficulties in conducting prevalence and incidence studies and the possible explanations for differences between studies are important. An international group of experts has worked to produce a consensus document that aims to delineate and discuss the important issues involved, and to provide guidance on approaches to conducting and interpreting pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence studies. The group's main findings are summarised in this paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19432659      PMCID: PMC7951416          DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00593.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  23 in total

Review 1.  How effective are prevention strategies in reducing the prevalence of pressure ulcers?

Authors:  M D Whitfield; E C Kaltenthaler; R L Akehurst; S J Walters; S Paisley
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.072

2.  The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.

Authors:  Katrien Vanderwee; Maria H F Grypdonck; Dirk De Bacquer; Tom Defloor
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.257

Review 3.  Identification of superficial pressure ulcers.

Authors:  J Evans; J Stephen-Haynes
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.072

Review 4.  Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo; Francisco Pedro Garcia-Fernandez; Isabel Ma Lopez-Medina; Carmen Alvarez-Nieto
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 5.  Pressure ulcer assessment instruments: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  M G Woodbury; P E Houghton; K E Campbell; D H Keast
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  The economics of pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  P Hibbs
Journal:  Decubitus       Date:  1988-08

7.  The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

Authors:  N Bergstrom; B J Braden; A Laguzza; V Holman
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  The Japanese pressure ulcer surveillance study: a retrospective cohort study to determine prevalence of pressure ulcers in Japanese hospitals.

Authors:  Hiromi Sanada; Yoshiki Miyachi; Takehiko Ohura; Takahiko Moriguchi; Keiko Tokunaga; Koichi Shido; Gojiro Nakagami
Journal:  Wounds       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Lisette Schoonhoven; Jeen R E Haalboom; Mente T Bousema; Ale Algra; Diederick E Grobbee; Maria H Grypdonck; Erik Buskens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-12

Review 10.  Pressure ulcers in neonates and children: an NPUAP white paper.

Authors:  Mona Mylene Baharestani; Catherine R Ratliff
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.347

View more
  19 in total

1.  Saudi Arabian adult intensive care unit pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Nahla Tayyib; Fiona Coyer; Peter Lewis
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in two Swedish County Councils: cross-sectional data as the foundation for future quality improvement.

Authors:  Lena Gunningberg; Nancy A Stotts; Ewa Idvall
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention: a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the APuP instrument.

Authors:  Jan Florin; Carina Bååth; Lena Gunningberg; Gunilla Mårtensson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Recent accomplishments in wound healing.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Mudge
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  [Pressure ulcers in German nursing homes: frequencies, grades, and origins].

Authors:  J Kottner; T Dassen; N A Lahmann
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  Pressure ulcer prevalence across Welsh orthopaedic units and community hospitals: surveys based on the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel minimum data set.

Authors:  Jane James; Julie A Evans; Trudie Young; Michael Clark
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers - a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Joseph C Gardiner; Philip L Reed; Joseph D Bonner; Diana K Haggerty; Daniel G Hale
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Implementation of pressure ulcer prevention best practice recommendations in acute care: an observational study.

Authors:  Anna Lucia Barker; Jeannette Kamar; Tamara Jane Tyndall; Lyn White; Anastasia Hutchinson; Nicole Klopfer; Carolina Weller
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Pressure ulcer knowledge of registered nurses, assistant nurses and student nurses: a descriptive, comparative multicentre study in Sweden.

Authors:  Lena Gunningberg; Gunilla Mårtensson; Anna-Greta Mamhidir; Jan Florin; Åsa Muntlin Athlin; Carina Bååth
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.315

10.  Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury: Risk-Adjusted Comparisons in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System.

Authors:  June Rondinelli; Stephen Zuniga; Patricia Kipnis; Lina Najib Kawar; Vincent Liu; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.