Literature DB >> 19430350

Rationale and design of a trial evaluating the effects of losartan vs. nebivolol vs. the association of both on the progression of aortic root dilation in Marfan syndrome with FBN1 gene mutations.

Fabiana I Gambarin1, Valentina Favalli, Alessandra Serio, Mario Regazzi, Michele Pasotti, Catherine Klersy, Roberto Dore, Savina Mannarino, Mario Viganò, Attilio Odero, Simona Amato, Luigi Tavazzi, Eloisa Arbustini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The major clinical problem of Marfan syndrome (MFS) is the aortic root aneurysm, with risk of dissection when the root diameter approximates 5 cm. In MFS, a key molecule, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), normally bound to the extracellular matrix, is free and activated. In an experimental setting, TGF-beta blockade prevents the aortic root structural damage and dilatation. The angiotensin receptor 1 blockers (sartanics) exert an anti-TGF-beta effect; trials are now ongoing for evaluating the effect of losartan compared with atenolol in MFS. beta-Adrenergic blockers are the drugs most commonly used in MFS. The third-generation beta-adrenergic blocker nebivolol retains the beta-adrenergic blocker effects on heart rate and further exerts antistiffness effects, typically increased in MFS.
METHODS: The open-label phase III study will include 291 patients with MFS and proven FBN1 gene mutations, with aortic root dilation (z-score > or =2.5). The patients will be randomized to nebivolol, losartan and the combination of the two drugs. The primary end point is the comparative evaluation of the effects of losartan, nebivolol and the association of both on the progression of aortic root growth rate. Secondary end points include the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs, comparative evaluation of serum levels of total and active TGF-beta, quantitative assessment of the expression of the mutated gene (FBN1, both 5' and 3'), pharmacogenetic bases of drug responsiveness. The quality of life evaluation in the three groups will be assessed. Statistical evaluation includes an interim analysis at month 24 and conclusive analyses at month 48.
CONCLUSION: The present study will add information about pharmacological therapy in MFS, supporting the new application of angiotensin receptor 1 blockers and finding beta-adrenergic blockers that may give more specific effects. Moreover, the study will further deepen understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms that are active in Marfan syndrome through the pharmacogenomic and transcriptomic mechanisms that may explain MFS phenotype variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19430350     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283232a45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  18 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers of abdominal aortic aneurysm progression. Part 2: inflammation.

Authors:  Femke A M V I Hellenthal; Willem A Buurman; Will K W H Wodzig; Geert Willem H Schurink
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Preventing the aortic complications of Marfan syndrome: a case-example of translational genomic medicine.

Authors:  Alain Li-Wan-Po; Bart Loeys; Peter Farndon; David Latham; Caroline Bradley
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Spontaneous arterial dissection: phenotype and molecular pathogenesis.

Authors:  Caspar Grond-Ginsbach; Rastislav Pjontek; Suna Su Aksay; Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr; Dittmar Böckler; Marie-Luise Gross-Weissmann
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  A healthy tension in translational research.

Authors:  Harry Dietz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Atenolol versus losartan in children and young adults with Marfan's syndrome.

Authors:  Ronald V Lacro; Harry C Dietz; Lynn A Sleeper; Anji T Yetman; Timothy J Bradley; Steven D Colan; Gail D Pearson; E Seda Selamet Tierney; Jami C Levine; Andrew M Atz; D Woodrow Benson; Alan C Braverman; Shan Chen; Julie De Backer; Bruce D Gelb; Paul D Grossfeld; Gloria L Klein; Wyman W Lai; Aimee Liou; Bart L Loeys; Larry W Markham; Aaron K Olson; Stephen M Paridon; Victoria L Pemberton; Mary Ella Pierpont; Reed E Pyeritz; Elizabeth Radojewski; Mary J Roman; Angela M Sharkey; Mario P Stylianou; Stephanie Burns Wechsler; Luciana T Young; Lynn Mahony
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Drug-based therapies for vascular disease in Marfan syndrome: from mouse models to human patients.

Authors:  Jason R Cook; Harikiran Nistala; Francesco Ramirez
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

7.  Genetic dissection of marfan syndrome and related connective tissue disorders: an update 2012.

Authors:  S Hoffjan
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2012-06-12

8.  High prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis in patients with inherited connective tissue disorders.

Authors:  J Pablo Abonia; Ting Wen; Emily M Stucke; Tommie Grotjan; Molly S Griffith; Katherine A Kemme; Margaret H Collins; Philip E Putnam; James P Franciosi; Karl F von Tiehl; Brad T Tinkle; Keith A Marsolo; Lisa J Martin; Stephanie M Ware; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 10.793

9.  Association between Oro-Facial Defects and Systemic Alterations in Children Affected by Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Raffaella Docimo; Paolo Maturo; Francesca D'Auria; Susanna Grego; Micaela Costacurta; Cesare Perugia; Luigi Chiariello
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-04-01

10.  Abnormal muscle mechanosignaling triggers cardiomyopathy in mice with Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Jason R Cook; Luca Carta; Ludovic Bénard; Elie R Chemaly; Emily Chiu; Satish K Rao; Thomas G Hampton; Peter Yurchenco; Kevin D Costa; Roger J Hajjar; Francesco Ramirez
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.