Literature DB >> 19428346

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of glycidyl methacrylate.

Tomasz Poplawski1, Elzbieta Pawlowska, Maria Wisniewska-Jarosinska, Dominika Ksiazek, Katarzyna Wozniak, Joanna Szczepanska, Janusz Blasiak.   

Abstract

Methacrylates are used in the polymer form as composite restorative materials in dentistry. However, the polymers can release monomers and co-monomers into the oral cavity and pulp, from where they can migrate into the bloodstream reaching virtually all organs. The local concentration of the released monomers can be in the millimolar range, high enough to induce adverse biological effects. Genotoxicity of methacrylate monomers is of a special significance due to potential serious phenotypic consequences, including cancer, and long latency period. In the present work, we investigated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) in the human peripheral blood lymphocytes and the CCR-CM human cancer cells. GMA at concentrations up to 5mM evoked a concentration-dependent decrease in the viability of the lymphocytes up to about 80%, as assessed by flow cytometry. This agent did not induce strand breaks in the isolated plasmid DNA, but evoked concentration-dependent DNA damage in the human lymphocytes evaluated by the alkaline and neutral comet assay. This damage included oxidative modifications to the DNA bases, as checked by DNA repair enzymes Endo III and Fpg as well as single and double DNA strand breaks. The lymphocytes exposed to GMA at 2.5 microM were able to remove about 90% of damage to their DNA in 120 min. The ability of GMA to induce DNA double-strand breaks was confirmed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. The drug evoked apoptosis and induced an increase in the G2/M cell population, accompanied by a decrease in the S cell population and an increase in G0/G1 cell population. Due to broad spectrum of GMA genotoxicity, including DNA double-strand breaks, and a potential long-lasting exposure to this compound, its use should be accompanied by precautions, reducing the chance of its release into blood stream and the possibility to induce adverse biological effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19428346     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Biol Interact        ISSN: 0009-2797            Impact factor:   5.192


  10 in total

1.  Lead Intoxication Synergies of the Ethanol-Induced Toxic Responses in Neuronal Cells--PC12.

Authors:  V Kumar; V K Tripathi; S Jahan; M Agrawal; A Pandey; V K Khanna; A B Pant
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Elution of monomers from three different bonding systems and their antibacterial effect.

Authors:  Olga Polydorou; Philipp Rogatti; Richard Bolek; Martin Wolkewitz; Klaus Kümmerer; Elmar Hellwig
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Experimental self-etching HEMA-free adhesive systems: cytotoxicity and degree of conversion.

Authors:  Marília Oliveira Barbosa; Rodrigo Varella de Carvalho; Flávio Fernando Demarco; Fabrício Aulo Ogliari; Cesar Henrique Zanchi; Evandro Piva; Adriana Fernandes da Silva
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Immune response to nanomaterials: implications for medicine and literature review.

Authors:  Saad Syed; Adeel Zubair; Marianne Frieri
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.806

5.  Dental methacrylates may exert genotoxic effects via the oxidative induction of DNA double strand breaks and the inhibition of their repair.

Authors:  Janusz Blasiak; Ewelina Synowiec; Justyna Tarnawska; Piotr Czarny; Tomasz Poplawski; Russel J Reiter
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Protective effect of chitosan oligosaccharide lactate against DNA double-strand breaks induced by a model methacrylate dental adhesive.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanska; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Ewelina Synowiec; Piotr Czarny; Marek Rekas; Janusz Blasiak; Jacek Pawel Szaflik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-08

7.  Independent and combined cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate and urethane dimethacrylate.

Authors:  Maria Wisniewska-Jarosinska; Tomasz Poplawski; Cezary J Chojnacki; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Renata Krupa; Joanna Szczepanska; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  2-hydroxylethyl methacrylate (HEMA), a tooth restoration component, exerts its genotoxic effects in human gingival fibroblasts trough methacrylic acid, an immediate product of its degradation.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanska; Tomasz Poplawski; Ewelina Synowiec; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Cezary J Chojnacki; Jan Chojnacki; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate induces a broad spectrum of DNA damage in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Kinga Drozdz; Daniel Wysokinski; Renata Krupa; Katarzyna Wozniak
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Helicobacter pylori infection and antioxidants can modulate the genotoxic effects of heterocyclic amines in gastric mucosa cells.

Authors:  Tomasz Poplawski; Cezary Chojnacki; Anna Czubatka; Grazyna Klupinska; Jan Chojnacki; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.316

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.