Literature DB >> 19427923

The effect of including quantitative heel ultrasound in models for estimation of 10-year absolute risk of fracture.

Alireza Moayyeri1, Stephen Kaptoge, Nichola Dalzell, Robert N Luben, Nicholas J Wareham, Sheila Bingham, Jonathan Reeve, Kay Tee Khaw.   

Abstract

The role of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in clinical practice is debatable. An unanswered question is that whether combining QUS and BMD measurements could improve the prediction of fracture risk. We examined this in a sample of men and women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk who had both heel QUS and hip DXA between 1995 and 1997 and were followed for any incident fracture up to 2007. From 1455 participants (703 men) aged 65-76 years at baseline, 79 developed a fracture over 10.3+/-1.4 years of follow-up. Two separate sex-stratified Cox proportional-hazard models were used including clinical risk factors and total hip BMD. Heel broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) was also included in the second model. Global measures of model fit, area under ROC curve, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic showed relative superiority of the model including BUA. Using each model, we calculated 10-year absolute risk of fracture for all participants and categorized them in groups of < 5%, 5% to < 15%, and > or = 15%. Comparison of groupings showed a total re-classification of 16.6% of participants after inclusion of BUA with the greatest re-classification (30.7%) among the group with intermediate risk. Adding a QUS measurement to models based on clinical risk factors and BMD improves the predictive power of models and suggests that further attention should be paid to QUS as a clinical tool for fracture risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19427923     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  10 in total

1.  Relationships among ultrasonic and mechanical properties of cancellous bone in human calcaneus in vitro.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Srinidhi Nagaraja; Maureen L Dreher; Saghi Sadoughi; Shan Zhu; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Calcaneal ultrasound reference ranges for Australian men and women: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  H Gould; S L Brennan; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz; M J Henry; J A Pasco
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative ultrasound of the heel and fracture risk assessment: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Moayyeri; J E Adams; R A Adler; M-A Krieg; D Hans; J Compston; E M Lewiecki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Missense polymorphisms of the WNT16 gene are associated with bone mass, hip geometry and fractures.

Authors:  C García-Ibarbia; M I Pérez-Núñez; J M Olmos; C Valero; M D Pérez-Aguilar; J L Hernández; M T Zarrabeitia; J González-Macías; J A Riancho
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Quantitative ultrasound and fracture risk prediction in non-osteoporotic men and women as defined by WHO criteria.

Authors:  M Y Chan; N D Nguyen; J R Center; J A Eisman; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Predictive values of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and dual energy X ray absorptiometry for non-vertebral fracture in older men: results from the MrOS study (Hong Kong).

Authors:  T Kwok; C C Khoo; J Leung; A Kwok; L Qin; J Woo; P C Leung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Multisite quantitative ultrasound for the prediction of fractures over 5 years of follow-up: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Wojciech P Olszynski; Jacques P Brown; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; George Ioannidis; Kenneth S Davison
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Genetic determinants of heel bone properties: genome-wide association meta-analysis and replication in the GEFOS/GENOMOS consortium.

Authors:  Alireza Moayyeri; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; David Karasik; Karol Estrada; Su-Mei Xiao; Carrie Nielson; Priya Srikanth; Sylvie Giroux; Scott G Wilson; Hou-Feng Zheng; Albert V Smith; Stephen R Pye; Paul J Leo; Alexander Teumer; Joo-Yeon Hwang; Claes Ohlsson; Fiona McGuigan; Ryan L Minster; Caroline Hayward; José M Olmos; Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen; Joshua R Lewis; Karin M A Swart; Laura Masi; Chris Oldmeadow; Elizabeth G Holliday; Sulin Cheng; Natasja M van Schoor; Nicholas C Harvey; Marcin Kruk; Fabiola del Greco M; Wilmar Igl; Olivia Trummer; Efi Grigoriou; Robert Luben; Ching-Ti Liu; Yanhua Zhou; Ling Oei; Carolina Medina-Gomez; Joseph Zmuda; Greg Tranah; Suzanne J Brown; Frances M Williams; Nicole Soranzo; Johanna Jakobsdottir; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Kate L Holliday; Anke Hannemann; Min Jin Go; Melissa Garcia; Ozren Polasek; Marika Laaksonen; Kun Zhu; Anke W Enneman; Mark McEvoy; Roseanne Peel; Pak Chung Sham; Maciej Jaworski; Åsa Johansson; Andrew A Hicks; Pawel Pludowski; Rodney Scott; Rosalie A M Dhonukshe-Rutten; Nathalie van der Velde; Mika Kähönen; Jorma S Viikari; Harri Sievänen; Olli T Raitakari; Jesús González-Macías; Jose L Hernández; Dan Mellström; Osten Ljunggren; Yoon Shin Cho; Uwe Völker; Matthias Nauck; Georg Homuth; Henry Völzke; Robin Haring; Matthew A Brown; Eugene McCloskey; Geoffrey C Nicholson; Richard Eastell; John A Eisman; Graeme Jones; Ian R Reid; Elaine M Dennison; John Wark; Steven Boonen; Dirk Vanderschueren; Frederick C W Wu; Thor Aspelund; J Brent Richards; Doug Bauer; Albert Hofman; Kay-Tee Khaw; George Dedoussis; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Ulf Gyllensten; Peter P Pramstaller; Roman S Lorenc; Cyrus Cooper; Annie Wai Chee Kung; Paul Lips; Markku Alen; John Attia; Maria Luisa Brandi; Lisette C P G M de Groot; Terho Lehtimäki; José A Riancho; Harry Campbell; Yongmei Liu; Tamara B Harris; Kristina Akesson; Magnus Karlsson; Jong-Young Lee; Henri Wallaschofski; Emma L Duncan; Terence W O'Neill; Vilmundur Gudnason; Timothy D Spector; François Rousseau; Eric Orwoll; Steven R Cummings; Nick J Wareham; Fernando Rivadeneira; Andre G Uitterlinden; Richard L Prince; Douglas P Kiel; Jonathan Reeve; Stephen K Kaptoge
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Relationship between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in young healthy men.

Authors:  J Rawal; K Eleftheriou; J Skipworth; Z Puthucheary; M Loosemore; J Payne; F Dreno; M World; F Haddad; S Humphries; H Montgomery
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Associations between Bone Material Strength Index, Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound, and Bone Mineral Density in Men.

Authors:  Pamela Rufus-Membere; Kara L Holloway-Kew; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Mark A Kotowicz; Julie A Pasco
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2020-11-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.