Literature DB >> 19427672

Biomechanical allometry in hominoid thoracic vertebrae.

C J Hernandez1, D A Loomis, M M Cotter, A L Schifle, L C Anderson, L Elsmore, C Kunos, B Latimer.   

Abstract

Considerable differences in spinal morphology have been noted between humans and other hominoids. Although comparative analyses of the external morphology of vertebrae have been performed, much less is known regarding variations in internal morphology (density) and biomechanical performance among humans and closely related non-human primates. In the current study we utilize density calibrated computed tomography images of thoracic vertebral bodies from hominoids (n=8-15 per species, human specimens 20-40 years of age) to obtain estimates of vertebral bone strength in axial compression and anteroposterior bending and to determine how estimates of strength scale with animal body mass. Our biomechanical analysis suggests that the strength of thoracic vertebral bodies is related to body mass (M) through power law relationships (y proportional, variant M(b)) in which the exponent b is 0.89 (reduced major axis) for prediction of axial compressive strength and is equal to 1.89 (reduced major axis) for prediction of bending strength. No differences in the relationship between body mass and strength were observed among hominoids. However, thoracic vertebrae from humans were found to be disproportionately larger in terms of vertebral length (distance between cranial and caudal endplates) and overall vertebral body volume (p<0.05). Additionally, vertebral bodies from humans were significantly less dense than in other hominoids (p<0.05). We suggest that reduced density in human vertebral bodies is a result of a systemic increase in porosity of cancellous bone in humans, while increased vertebral body volume and length are a result of functional adaptation during growth resulting in a vertebral bone structure that is just as strong, relative to body mass, as in other hominoids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19427672     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  6 in total

1.  BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ.

Authors:  Michael Doube; Michał M Kłosowski; Ignacio Arganda-Carreras; Fabrice P Cordelières; Robert P Dougherty; Jonathan S Jackson; Benjamin Schmid; John R Hutchinson; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 2.  A review of trabecular bone functional adaptation: what have we learned from trabecular analyses in extant hominoids and what can we apply to fossils?

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Gracility of the modern Homo sapiens skeleton is the result of decreased biomechanical loading.

Authors:  Timothy M Ryan; Colin N Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Human evolution and osteoporosis-related spinal fractures.

Authors:  Meghan M Cotter; David A Loomis; Scott W Simpson; Bruce Latimer; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The ancestral shape hypothesis: an evolutionary explanation for the occurrence of intervertebral disc herniation in humans.

Authors:  Kimberly A Plomp; Una Strand Viðarsdóttir; Darlene A Weston; Keith Dobney; Mark Collard
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Dorsal and ventral thoracic 12 vertebra body height is associated with incident lumbar vertebral fracture in postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

Authors:  Yun-Sic Bang; Seunghoon Lee; Keum Nae Kang; Joohyun Lee; Hye-Won Jeong; Soo Il Choi; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.458

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.