Literature DB >> 19427537

Spinal reflex in human lower leg muscles evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.

Koichi Kitano1, David M Koceja.   

Abstract

The H-reflex is one of the most common and useful techniques in the field of motor control. However, the H-reflex technique also involves difficulty in data interpretation when stimulus intensity is high enough to stimulate both sensory and motor fibers (antidromic current). On the other hand, transcutaneous stimulation applied on the spinous processes is able to stimulate the dorsal root, resulting in selective stimulation of only sensory fibers without evoking a direct motor response and antidromic current on the motor fibers. The purpose of this study was to examine the maximal reflex response that can be elicited in the lower leg muscles using transcutaneous spinal stimulation. Seven subjects participated in the study. EMG signals were recorded from triceps surae (SOL, MG, LG) in the prone position. Transcutaneous stimulation was applied both to the spinous process (between T11 and T12, spinal stimulation, SS) and to the popliteal fossa (peripheral stimulation, PS). Using SS and PS, H(max) amplitudes of triceps surae muscles were measured and standardized with M(max). H(max) values in MG and LG by SS (31% and 41%) were significantly greater than those by PS (20% and 23%, respectively). Although not significant, H(max) amplitude in SOL by SS (76%) was also greater than that by PS (60%). It is suggested that transcutaneous stimulation is able to evoke H-reflex without a direct motor response. H(max) amplitudes traditionally measured by stimulation applied to a mixed nerve may underestimate the potential connectivity between the sensory and motor systems in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19427537     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  15 in total

1.  Remote muscle contraction enhances spinal reflexes in multiple lower-limb muscles elicited by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Yohei Masugi; Atsushi Sasaki; Naotsugu Kaneko; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spinal segment-specific transcutaneous stimulation differentially shapes activation pattern among motor pools in humans.

Authors:  Dimitry G Sayenko; Darryn A Atkinson; Christine J Dy; Katelyn M Gurley; Valerie L Smith; Claudia Angeli; Susan J Harkema; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-03-26

3.  Effect of percutaneous stimulation at different spinal levels on the activation of sensory and motor roots.

Authors:  François D Roy; Grady Gibson; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Similarities and differences in cervical and thoracolumbar multisegmental motor responses and the combined use for testing spinal circuitries.

Authors:  Mohamed A Sabbahi; Selda Uzun; Fikriye Ovak Bittar; Yesim Sengul
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Caitlin Hurd; John Martin; Karim Fouad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Profiling motor control in spinal cord injury: moving towards individualized therapy and evidence-based care progression.

Authors:  Keith E Tansey
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Intersession reliability of thoracolumbar multisegmental motor responses.

Authors:  Selda Uzun; Fikriye Ovak Bittar; Mohamed A Sabbahi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 8.  Nervous system modulation through electrical stimulation in companion animals.

Authors:  Ângela Martins; Débora Gouveia; Ana Cardoso; Óscar Gamboa; Darryl Millis; António Ferreira
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 1.695

9.  Body Position Influences Which Neural Structures Are Recruited by Lumbar Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Matthias Krenn; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Andrea Toth; Winfried Mayr; Karen Minassian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Common neural structures activated by epidural and transcutaneous lumbar spinal cord stimulation: Elicitation of posterior root-muscle reflexes.

Authors:  Ursula S Hofstoetter; Brigitta Freundl; Heinrich Binder; Karen Minassian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.