Literature DB >> 19425951

Evolutionary response of escherichia coli to thermal stress.

R E Lenski, A F Bennett.   

Abstract

We used a clone of the bacterium Escherichia coli previously adapted to 37 degrees C to found replicate populations propagated at constant 32 degrees C, constant 37 degrees C, constant 42 degrees C, and a daily alternation between 32 degrees and 42 degrees C. Several criteria indicate that 42 degrees was stressful for the ancestor, while 32 degrees and 37 degrees C were not. For example, 42 degrees C was within 1 degrees C of the limit for extinction, and yield was substantially reduced at this temperature. Adaptation was assayed by competing derived genotypes against their common ancestor at various temperatures. Bacteria adapted much more rapidly to 42 degrees C than to either lower temperature. Also, bacteria propagated in the alternating environment exhibited greater adaptation to 42 degrees C than to 32 degrees C. Adaptation was temperature-specific in all groups, but adaptation to 42 degrees C entailed little loss of fitness at lower temperatures. Nor did adaptation to 42 degrees C much extend the upper limit for population persistence, although we isolated more thermotolerant mutants by imposing hard selection. Thus, whereas the stressful 42 degrees C environment consistently led to more rapid adaptive evolution than did nonstressful regimes, superstressful temperatures caused either extremely rapid adaptive evolution or extinction. Although defining stress in general terms is difficult, one can evaluate specific criteria and test evolutionary hypotheses using appropriate experimental systems.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 19425951     DOI: 10.1086/285522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  26 in total

Review 1.  New insights into bacterial adaptation through in vivo and in silico experimental evolution.

Authors:  Thomas Hindré; Carole Knibbe; Guillaume Beslon; Dominique Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Local distribution and thermal ecology of two intertidal fishes.

Authors:  Jose M Pulgar; Francisco Bozinovic; F Patricio Ojeda
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Asymmetric competition impacts evolutionary rescue in a changing environment.

Authors:  Courtney L Van Den Elzen; Elizabeth J Kleynhans; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Evolutionary consequences of simulated global change: genetic adaptation or adaptive phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  Catherine Potvin; Denise Tousignant
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Evolution of climatic niche specialization: a phylogenetic analysis in amphibians.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Bonetti; John J Wiens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The association among gene expression responses to nine abiotic stress treatments in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  William R Swindell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic variation in clones of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes after ten months of selection in different thermal environments in the laboratory.

Authors:  Bihong Shi; Xuhua Xia
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Thermal adaptation in Drosophila serrata under conditions linked to its southern border: unexpected patterns from laboratory selection suggest limited evolutionary potential.

Authors:  Andréa Magiafoglou; Ary Hoffmann
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

10.  Compensatory evolution of gene regulation in response to stress by Escherichia coli lacking RpoS.

Authors:  Daniel M Stoebel; Karsten Hokamp; Michael S Last; Charles J Dorman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.