OBJECTIVE: To examine the operating characteristics of the Patient Health Questionnaire eating disorder module (PHQ-ED) for identifying bulimia nervosa/binge eating disorder (BN/BED) or recurrent binge eating (RBE) in a community sample and to compare true positive (TP) versus false positive (FP) cases on clinical validators. METHOD: Two hundred and fifty-nine screen-positive individuals and a random sample of 89 screen negative cases completed a diagnostic interview. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. TP and FP cases were compared using t-tests and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: The PHQ-ED had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92%) for detecting BN/BED or RBE, but PPV was low (10 or 19%). TP and FP cases did not differ significantly on frequency of subjective bulimic episodes, objective overeating, restraint, on BMI, and on self-rated health. DISCUSSION: The PHQ-ED is recommended for use in large populations only in conjunction with follow-up questions to rule out cases without objective bulimic episodes. 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the operating characteristics of the Patient Health Questionnaire eating disorder module (PHQ-ED) for identifying bulimia nervosa/binge eating disorder (BN/BED) or recurrent binge eating (RBE) in a community sample and to compare true positive (TP) versus false positive (FP) cases on clinical validators. METHOD: Two hundred and fifty-nine screen-positive individuals and a random sample of 89 screen negative cases completed a diagnostic interview. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. TP and FP cases were compared using t-tests and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: The PHQ-ED had high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92%) for detecting BN/BED or RBE, but PPV was low (10 or 19%). TP and FP cases did not differ significantly on frequency of subjective bulimic episodes, objective overeating, restraint, on BMI, and on self-rated health. DISCUSSION: The PHQ-ED is recommended for use in large populations only in conjunction with follow-up questions to rule out cases without objective bulimic episodes. 2009 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: R H Striegel-Moore; L DeBar; G T Wilson; J Dickerson; F Rosselli; N Perrin; F Lynch; H C Kraemer Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2007-11-02 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Rachel Kimerling; Lori A Bastian; Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry; Meggan M Bucossi; Diane V Carney; Karen M Goldstein; Ciaran S Phibbs; Alyssa Pomernacki; Anne G Sadler; Elizabeth M Yano; Susan M Frayne Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Kate Harvey; Francine Rosselli; G Terence Wilson; Lynn L Debar; Ruth H Striegel-Moore Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: John F Dickerson; Lynn DeBar; Nancy A Perrin; Frances Lynch; G Terence Wilson; Francine Rosselli; Helena C Kraemer; Ruth H Striegel-Moore Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Andrea K Graham; Mickey Trockel; Hannah Weisman; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Katherine N Balantekin; Denise E Wilfley; C Barr Taylor Journal: J Am Coll Health Date: 2018-10-09
Authors: Frances L Lynch; Ruth H Striegel-Moore; John F Dickerson; Nancy Perrin; Lynn Debar; G Terence Wilson; Helena C Kraemer Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2010-06
Authors: Lynn L Debar; G Terence Wilson; Bobbi Jo Yarborough; Beryl Burns; Barbara Oyler; Tom Hildebrandt; Gregory N Clarke; John Dickerson; Ruth H Striegel Journal: Cogn Behav Pract Date: 2013-05-01