| Literature DB >> 19424824 |
Marilena Vered1, Irit Allon, Amos Buchner, Dan Dayan.
Abstract
Stromal myofibroblasts (SMF) associated with various types of carcinomas are believed to emerge under the influence of the tumor cells. Recent studies have shown that SMF may originate from fibroblasts within the tumor stroma or even from carcinoma cells by the process of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. The aim of this study was to investigate the concomitant expression of epithelial membrane antigen and alpha-smooth muscle actin in cells at the tumor-connective tissue interface in human tongue carcinoma, as a possible reflection of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Given its key role in this process, expression of transforming growth factor-beta in the malignant cells was assessed as well. Immunostaining with alpha-smooth muscle actin was performed on cases of hyperplasia (n = 16), mild dysplasia (n = 12), moderate-to-severe dysplasia (n = 11) and carcinoma (n = 22). Transforming growth factor-beta assessment and double immunostaining with epithelial membrane antigen and alpha-smooth muscle actin were performed only in cases of carcinoma. SMF were significantly associated with carcinomas, while their number in pre-malignant lesions (hyperplasia and dysplasia) was significantly lower (P < 0.001). Although SMF were found in all carcinomas, they were heterogeneous in their frequency and patterns of distribution. In addition, 95% of the carcinomas expressed transforming growth factor-beta and 41% exhibited cells positive for both epithelial membrane antigen and alpha-smooth muscle actin. SMF were almost exclusively associated with established carcinomas and not with pre-malignant lesions. Cells that co-expressed epithelial membrane antigen and alpha-smooth muscle actin can be a manifestation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and, as such, may serve as a source for SMF in these tumors. These findings appear to be linked to the frequent expression of transforming growth factor-beta by the malignant cells.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19424824 PMCID: PMC2787928 DOI: 10.1007/s12307-009-0020-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Microenviron ISSN: 1875-2284
Mean % of α-smooth muscle actin-positive SMF/intersection according to study groups
| Study group | Mean ± SD % of stained SMF (range) |
|---|---|
| Hyperplasia | 0.9 ± 0.5 (0.2–2.6) |
| Mild dysplasia | 1.1 ± 0.5 (0.5–2.0) |
| Moderate-to-severe dysplasia | 0.8 ± 0.3 (0.3–1.3) |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 14.7 ± 12.8* (1.2–51.4) |
* P < 0.001
Fig. 1a Epithelial hyperplasia and b moderate-to-severe dysplasia showing α-smooth muscle actin immunostaining only in smooth muscle cells within blood vessel walls. No α-smooth muscle actin immunostaining corresponding to stromal myofibroblasts could be identified. c Abundance of stromal myofibroblasts in a “network” and, d “spindle” pattern (anti-α-smooth muscle actin antibody, amino ethyl-carbazole (AEC) method; a—bar 500 μ; b, c, d—bar 200 μ)
Cases of tongue squamous cell carcinoma according to increasing values of mean % of SMF and the respective pattern of distribution of SMF, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) double staining and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β pattern
| Case no. | Mean % of SMF | Pattern of distribution of SMF | EMA and α-SMA double staining | TGF-β pattern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2 | Spindle | + | Focal |
| 2 | 1.3 | Spindle | + | Focal |
| 3 | 1.8 | Spindle | − | Focal |
| 4 | 3.7 | Spindle | − | Focal |
| 5 | 4.1 | Spindle | − | Focal |
| 6 | 7 | Spindle | − | Focal |
| 7 | 7.2 | Spindle | − | Focal |
| 8 | 7.8 | Spindle | − | Diffuse |
| 9 | 8.75 | Spindle | − | Diffuse |
| 10 | 10.7 | Spindle | + | Focal |
| 11 | 11 | Spindle | − | No Stain |
| 12 | 11.5 | Spindle | − | Focal |
| 13 | 12.65 | Spindle | − | Focal |
| 14 | 13 | Spindle | − | Diffuse |
| 15 | 13.5 | Spindle | + | Diffuse |
| 16 | 16.1 | Spindle | − | Focal |
| 17 | 24.2 | Spindle | − | Diffuse |
| 18 | 24.4 | Network | + | Focal |
| 19 | 28.2 | Network | + | Focal |
| 20 | 28.5 | Network | + | Diffuse |
| 21 | 33.6 | Network | + | Diffuse |
| 22 | 51.4 | Network | + | Focal |
(+), positive double immunostaining and (−) negative double immunostaining
Fig. 2a Transforming growth factor-β positivity in carcinoma cells in a “focal” pattern as indicated by arrows; b a “diffuse” pattern (anti-transforming growth factor-β antibody, amino ethyl-carbazole (AEC) method; bar 500 μ)
Fig. 3a Small islands of carcinoma cells at the invading front showing a stellate-shaped and fusiform architecture with cytoplasmic projections, some with a fibroblastoid appearance. Remnants of epithelial membrane antigen staining (purple membranous/cytoplasmic stain) disclose their epithelial origin. Brownish cytoplasmic staining of α-smooth muscle actin is observed in a few foci within the carcinoma cells (arrows) (anti-epithelial membrane antigen and anti-α-smooth muscle actin antigen antibodies, Fast-red and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) double immunostaining; bar 50 μ). b Spindle carcinoma cells with remnants of epithelial membrane antigen staining and an area of brown cytoplasmic stain compatible with α-smooth muscle actin positivity (thin arrow). A cluster of carcinoma cells negative for epithelial membrane antigen and positive for α-smooth muscle actin is seen in the upper left corner (thick arrow) (bar 20 μ)