OBJECTIVES: To assess parent-child agreement on changes over a short-term period of time in the HRQOL of children treated for ADHD over a short period of time, and to compare child and parent ratings of children with ADHD with general population norms. METHODS: Prospective study in children 6-12 years old with ADHD. Children and parents completed the Spanish versions of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Child Edition (CHIP-CE) before and after 8 weeks of treatment. CHIP-PE scores at both visits were compared using paired t tests and effect sizes (ES), intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and scatter plots. Child and parent ratings were compared with CHIP-CE scores for a general population sample. RESULTS: Thirty-one children and parents were included in the analysis. The highest change between the first and the follow-up visit was on the Risk Avoidance domain both children and parents (effect size [ES]=0.24 and 0.40, respectively). The ICC ranged from 0.44 (Satisfaction) to 0.01 (Risk avoidance). Child self-ratings were close to general population values. All domains of the parent version presented standardized means below the reference values at the baseline visit and closer to the general population norm after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study found poor parent-child agreement and suggests that both ratings should be collected in future studies on the impact of ADHD and treatment effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: To assess parent-child agreement on changes over a short-term period of time in the HRQOL of children treated for ADHD over a short period of time, and to compare child and parent ratings of children with ADHD with general population norms. METHODS: Prospective study in children 6-12 years old with ADHD. Children and parents completed the Spanish versions of the Child Health and Illness Profile-Child Edition (CHIP-CE) before and after 8 weeks of treatment. CHIP-PE scores at both visits were compared using paired t tests and effect sizes (ES), intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and scatter plots. Child and parent ratings were compared with CHIP-CE scores for a general population sample. RESULTS: Thirty-one children and parents were included in the analysis. The highest change between the first and the follow-up visit was on the Risk Avoidance domain both children and parents (effect size [ES]=0.24 and 0.40, respectively). The ICC ranged from 0.44 (Satisfaction) to 0.01 (Risk avoidance). Child self-ratings were close to general population values. All domains of the parent version presented standardized means below the reference values at the baseline visit and closer to the general population norm after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study found poor parent-child agreement and suggests that both ratings should be collected in future studies on the impact of ADHD and treatment effectiveness.
Authors: Maureen Hack; Christopher B Forrest; Mark Schluchter; H Gerry Taylor; Dennis Drotar; Grayson Holmbeck; Laura Andreias Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-10
Authors: Maria-Dolors Estrada; Luis Rajmil; Michael Herdman; Vicky Serra-Sutton; Cristian Tebé; Jordi Alonso; Anne W Riley; Christopher B Forrest; Barbara Starfield Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-08-14 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Maria-Dolors Estrada; Luis Rajmil; Vicky Serra-Sutton; Cristian Tebé; Jordi Alonso; Michael Herdman; Anne W Riley; Christopher B Forrest; Barbara Starfield Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Marzieh Alamolhoda; Mohammad Farjami; Zahra Bagheri; Ahmad Ghanizadeh; Peyman Jafari Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Luis Rajmil; Amanda Rodríguez López; Sílvia López-Aguilà; Jordi Alonso Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 3.186