Literature DB >> 19422061

A novel method for predicting and using distance constraints of high accuracy for refining protein structure prediction.

Tianyun Liu1, Jeremy A Horst, Ram Samudrala.   

Abstract

The principal bottleneck in protein structure prediction is the refinement of models from lower accuracies to the resolution observed by experiment. We developed a novel constraints-based refinement method that identifies a high number of accurate input constraints from initial models and rebuilds them using restrained torsion angle dynamics (rTAD). We previously created a Bayesian statistics-based residue-specific all-atom probability discriminatory function (RAPDF) to discriminate native-like models by measuring the probability of accuracy for atom type distances within a given model. Here, we exploit RAPDF to score (i.e., filter) constraints from initial predictions that may or may not be close to a native-like state, obtain consensus of top scoring constraints amongst five initial models, and compile sets with no redundant residue pair constraints. We find that this method consistently produces a large and highly accurate set of distance constraints from which to build refinement models. We further optimize the balance between accuracy and coverage of constraints by producing multiple structure sets using different constraint distance cutoffs, and note that the cutoff governs spatially near versus distant effects in model generation. This complete procedure of deriving distance constraints for rTAD simulations improves the quality of initial predictions significantly in all cases evaluated by us. Our procedure represents a significant step in solving the protein structure prediction and refinement problem, by enabling the use of consensus constraints, RAPDF, and rTAD for protein structure modeling and refinement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19422061      PMCID: PMC2874729          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  47 in total

1.  Relationship between multiple sequence alignments and quality of protein comparative models.

Authors:  Domenico Cozzetto; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-01-01

Review 2.  Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions.

Authors:  Ora Schueler-Furman; Chu Wang; Phil Bradley; Kira Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins.

Authors:  Philip Bradley; Kira M S Misura; David Baker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Conformer generation under restraints.

Authors:  Paul I W de Bakker; Nicholas Furnham; Tom L Blundell; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  The structural alignment between two proteins: is there a unique answer?

Authors:  A Godzik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Handling context-sensitivity in protein structures using graph theory: bona fide prediction.

Authors:  R Samudrala; J Moult
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997

7.  Protein modeling by multiple sequence threading and distance geometry.

Authors:  A Aszódi; R E Munro; W R Taylor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1997

8.  Fold assembly of small proteins using monte carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments.

Authors:  A R Ortiz; A Kolinski; J Skolnick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-03-27       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  MONSSTER: a method for folding globular proteins with a small number of distance restraints.

Authors:  J Skolnick; A Kolinski; A R Ortiz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-01-17       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  3 in total

1.  Relative packing groups in template-based structure prediction: cooperative effects of true positive constraints.

Authors:  Ryan Day; Xiaotao Qu; Rosemarie Swanson; Zach Bohannan; Robert Bliss; Jerry Tsai
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Diversity of protein structures and difficulties in fold recognition: the curious case of protein G.

Authors:  Jeremy Horst; Ram Samudrala
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2009-09-08

3.  A fragment based method for modeling of protein segments into cryo-EM density maps.

Authors:  Jochen Ismer; Alexander S Rose; Johanna K S Tiemann; Peter W Hildebrand
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.