Literature DB >> 19421757

Retroperitoneoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in infants and children: a 60-case report.

Huixia Zhou1, Hongzhao Li, Xu Zhang, Xin Ma, Hua Xu, Taoping Shi, Baojun Wang, Guoxi Zhang, Zhenghua Ju, Chao Wang, Jun Li, Zhun Wu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a new technique of retroperitoneoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty (AHDP) in infants and children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) based on our clinical experience.
METHODS: From March 2003 to February 2007, retroperitoneoscopic AHDP was performed in 60 (44 boys and 16 girls) UPJO infants and children with a three-port lateral retroperitoneal approach. The retroperitoneal space was entered via a 1-cm longitudinal incision beneath the 12th rib and further developed by a glove balloon. Video-retroperitoneoscopy was undertaken with a 5-mm laparoscope between the mid axillary line and 1 cm away from the superior border of iliac crest. Dismembered pyeloplasty was carried out with the Anderson-Hynes anastomosis where 5-0 or 6-0 vicryl sutures were over a double-J ureteric stent. Anastomosis was completed with freehand intracorporeal suture techniques. Follow-up studies were conducted by intravenous urography and renal ultrasonography.
RESULTS: Among the 60 patients (62 sides) with retroperitoneoscopic AHDP, only the first two cases were converted to open surgery due to difficulties in developing the retroperitoneal space, and the remaining cases succeeded. The average operative time was 70 +/- 12.6 min (ranging from 55 to 130 min), the average estimated blood loss was 10 +/- 2.2 ml (ranging from 5 to 20 ml), and the average postoperative hospital stay was 7 +/- 1.3 days (ranging from 3 to 15 days). Aberrant artery vessel was intraoperatively observed in seven patients. Postoperative urinary leakage occurred in two patients, but spontaneously disappeared on the 6th and 11th days after the surgery, respectively; and one of them underwent open surgery for recurrent UPJO 8 months later. During an average follow-up period of 24 months, we performed radiographic assessment by intravenous urography and found that all the cases showed good results except the patient who underwent open surgery later.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with retroperitoneoscopic AHDP demonstrates that this technique is safe, effective and time saving for treating UPJO in infants and children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19421757     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-009-2369-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  10 in total

1.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: experience with 50 cases.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Hong-Zhao Li; Shao-Gang Wang; Xin Ma; Tao Zheng; Bin Fu; Jun Zhang; Zhang-Qun Ye
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome.

Authors:  J J Bauer; J T Bishoff; R G Moore; R N Chen; A J Iverson; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  W W Schuessler; M T Grune; L V Tecuanhuey; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Nonintubated Anderson-Hynes repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 60 patients.

Authors:  D H Nguyen; H Aliabadi; C J Ercole; R Gonzalez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Retroperitoneoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in infants and children.

Authors:  C K Yeung; Y H Tam; J D Sihoe; K H Lee; K W Liu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate.

Authors:  H Danuser; D K Ackermann; D Böhlen; U E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: a 12-year perspective.

Authors:  M Gupta; O L Tuncay; A D Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Long-term follow-up of patients with hydronephrosis treated by Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty.

Authors:  S S Mikkelsen; B S Rasmussen; T M Jensen; W Hanghøj-Petersen; P O Christensen
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1992-08

9.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children.

Authors:  A El-Ghoneimi; W Farhat; S Bolduc; D Bagli; G McLorie; Y Aigrain; A Khoury
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Indications, technique, and long-term outcome.

Authors:  R N Chen; R G Moore; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.241

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Experience with retroperitoneoscopy in pediatric surgical oncology.

Authors:  Till M Theilen; Thambipillai Sri Paran; Daniel Rutigliano; Leonard Wexler; Yukio Sonoda; Michael P LaQuaglia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty in infants and children: initial experience and short-term outcome.

Authors:  Huixia Zhou; Ning Sun; Xu Zhang; Huawei Xie; Lifei Ma; Zhou Shen; Xiaoguang Zhou; Tian Tao
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Benefits of Retroperitoneoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Urology.

Authors:  Mariapina Cerulo; M Escolino; F Turrà; A Roberti; A Farina; C Esposito
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  National Trends in Followup Imaging after Pyeloplasty in Children in the United States.

Authors:  Ryan S Hsi; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Thomas S Lendvay; Jonathan D Harper
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Follow-up imaging after pediatric pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Sanjeet Kumar Singh; Sohrab Arora; Varun Mittal; Nitesh Patidar; Sanjoy Kumar Sureka; M S Ansari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

6.  Evaluation of the clinical value of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: A single-center experience involving 22 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Shilin Zhang; Jierong Li; Chunjing Li; Xumin Xie; Fengsheng Ling; Yongjie Liang; Guoqing Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Comparative study of different surgical approaches for treatment of UPJ obstruction according to the degree/severity of hydronephrosis factor.

Authors:  Peng Zhao; Cao Wang; Kaiyi Mao; Zhen Luo; Yingbo Li; Guangxu Zhou; Hongyang Tan; Hong Liu; Yucheng Mao; Hong Ma; Xianhui Shang; Bin Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.569

8.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: experience of 226 cases at one centre.

Authors:  Marcin Polok; Dominika Borselle; Krystian Toczewski; Wojciech Apoznański; Diana Jędrzejuk; Dariusz Patkowski
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.318

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.