Literature DB >> 1942172

A prospective analysis of injury severity among helmeted and nonhelmeted bicyclists involved in collisions with motor vehicles.

D W Spaite1, M Murphy, E A Criss, T D Valenzuela, H W Meislin.   

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of helmet use on injury severity, patient information was prospectively obtained for all bicyclists involved in collisions with motor vehicles seen at a level-I trauma center from January 1986 to January 1989. Two hundred ninety-eight patients were evaluated; in 284 (95.3%, study group) cases there was documentation of helmet use or nonuse. One hundred sixteen patients (40.9%) wore helmets and 168 (59.1%) did not. One hundred ninety-nine patients (70.1%) had an ISS less than 15, while 85 (29.9%) were severely injured (ISS greater than 15). Only 5.2% of helmet users (6/116) had an ISS greater than 15 compared with 47.0% (79/168) of nonusers (p less than 0.0001). The mean ISS for helmet users was 3.8 compared with 18.0 for nonusers (p less than 0.0001). Mortality was higher for nonusers (10/168, 6.0%) than for helmet users (1/116, 0.9%; p less than 0.025). A striking finding was noted when the group of patients without major head injuries (246) was analyzed separately. Helmet users in this group still had a much lower mean ISS (3.6 vs. 12.9, p less than 0.001) and were much less likely to have an ISS greater than 15 (4.4% vs. 32.1%, p less than 0.0001) than were nonusers. In this group, 42 of 47 patients with an ISS greater than 15 (89.4%) were not wearing helmets. We conclude that helmet nonuse is strongly associated with severe injuries in this study population. This is true even when the patients without major head injuries are analyzed as a group; a finding to our knowledge not previously described.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1942172     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199111000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  21 in total

Review 1.  What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews.

Authors:  D S Morrison; M Petticrew; H Thomson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Risk compensation theory and voluntary helmet use by cyclists in Spain.

Authors:  P Lardelli-Claret; J de Dios Luna-del-Castillo; J J Jiménez-Moleón; M García-Martín; A Bueno-Cavanillas; R Gálvez-Vargas
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Counseling to reduce road injuries and deaths.

Authors:  D Johnson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Children and bicycles: what is really happening? Studies of fatal and non-fatal bicycle injury.

Authors:  C H Acton; S Thomas; J W Nixon; R Clark; W R Pitt; D Battistutta
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 5.  Can we prevent accidental injury to adolescents? A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  J Munro; P Coleman; J Nicholl; R Harper; G Kent; D Wild
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  Arguments against helmet legislation are flawed.

Authors:  Brent Hagel; Alison Macpherson; Frederick P Rivara; Barry Pless
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-25

Review 7.  No clear evidence from countries that have enforced the wearing of helmets.

Authors:  D L Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-25

Review 8.  Childhood accidents: epidemiology, trends, and prevention.

Authors:  A Kemp; J Sibert
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1997-09

9.  The pattern of injury in fatal pedal cycle accidents and the possible benefits of cycle helmets.

Authors:  A Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Bicyclist and environmental factors associated with fatal bicycle-related trauma in Ontario.

Authors:  B H Rowe; A M Rowe; G W Bota
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.