Literature DB >> 19419404

Nondipolar content of T wave derived from a myocardial source simulation with increased repolarization inhomogeneity.

Milos Kesek1, Ola Gustavsson, Urban Wiklund.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several conditions with repolarization disturbances are associated with increased level of nondipolar components of the T wave. The nondipolar content has been proposed as a measure of repolarization inhomogeneity. This computer simulation study examines the link between increased nondipolar components and increased repolarization inhomogeneity in an established model.
METHODS: The simulation was performed with Ecgsim software that uses the equivalent double-layer source model. In the model, the shape of transmembrane potential is derived from biological recordings. Increased repolarization inhomogeneity was simulated globally by increasing the variance in action potential duration and locally by introducing changes mimicking acute myocardial infarction. We synthesized surface ECG recordings with 12, 18, and 300 leads. The T-wave residue was calculated by singular value decomposition. The study examined the effects of the number of ECG leads, changes in definition of end of T wave and random noise added to the signal.
RESULTS: Normal myocardial source gave a low level of nondipolar content. Increased nondipolar content was observed in the two types of increased repolarization inhomogeneity. Noise gave a large increase in the nondipolar content. The sensitivity of the result to noise increased when a higher number of principal components were used in the computation.
CONCLUSIONS: The nondipolar content of the T wave was associated with repolarization inhomogeneity in the computer model. The measure was very sensitive to noise, especially when principal components of high order were included in the computations. Increased number of ECG leads resulted in an increased signal-to-noise ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19419404      PMCID: PMC6932074          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2009.00294.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  16 in total

1.  A farewell to QT dispersion. Are the alternatives any better?

Authors:  Pentti M Rautaharju
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  What resides in T-wave residuum?

Authors:  Arthur J Moss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-09

3.  Validation of ECG indices of ventricular repolarization heterogeneity: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Bart Hooft Van Huysduynen; Cees A Swenne; Harmen H M Draisma; M Louisa Antoni; Hedde Van De Vooren; Ernst E Van Der Wall; Martin J Schalij
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-10

4.  T-wave morphology parameters based on principal component analysis reproducibility and dependence on T-offset position.

Authors:  Fabrice Extramiana; Abdeddayem Haggui; Pierre Maison-Blanche; Rémi Dubois; Seiji Takatsuki; Philippe Beaufils; Antoine Leenhardt
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  The effect of signal averaging on the reproducibility and reliability of measures of T-wave morphology.

Authors:  Bjorn H Batdorf; Alan H Feiveson; Todd T Schlegel
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Dispersion of repolarization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Bart Hooft van Huysduynen; Cees A Swenne; Jeroen J Bax; Gabe B Bleeker; Harmen H M Draisma; Lieselot van Erven; Sander G Molhoek; Hedde van de Vooren; Ernst E van der Wall; Martin J Schalij
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Dipolarity and dipole location during QRS and T waves in normal men estimated from body surface potential distribution.

Authors:  H Tsunakawa; K Hoshino; S Kanesaka; K Harumi; Y Okamoto; Y Teramachi; T Musha
Journal:  Jpn Heart J       Date:  1985-05

8.  QT dispersion does not represent electrocardiographic interlead heterogeneity of ventricular repolarization.

Authors:  M Malik; B Acar; Y Gang; Y G Yap; K Hnatkova; A J Camm
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-08

9.  Principal component analysis of the T wave in patients with chest pain and conduction disturbances.

Authors:  Milos Kesek; Tomas Jernberg; Bertil Lindahl; Joel Xue; Anders Englund
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Characteristics and possible mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia dependent on the dispersion of action potential durations.

Authors:  C S Kuo; K Munakata; C P Reddy; B Surawicz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Nondipolar electrocardiographic components and myocardial heterogeneity.

Authors:  Marek Malik
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Analysis of ECG Measures of Cardiac Repolarization in Relation to Arrhythmic Events in an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Population.

Authors:  Bijia Shi; Scott Harding; Peter Larsen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 1.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.