Literature DB >> 16360079

Dispersion of repolarization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Bart Hooft van Huysduynen1, Cees A Swenne, Jeroen J Bax, Gabe B Bleeker, Harmen H M Draisma, Lieselot van Erven, Sander G Molhoek, Hedde van de Vooren, Ernst E van der Wall, Martin J Schalij.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proarrhythmic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as a result of increased transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) induced by left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing in a subset of vulnerable patients have been reported. The possibility of identifying these patients by ECG repolarization indices has been suggested.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test whether repolarization indices on the ECG can be used to measure dispersion of repolarization during pacing.
METHODS: CRT devices of 28 heart failure patients were switched among biventricular, LV, and right ventricular (RV) pacing. ECG indices proposed to measure dispersion of repolarization were calculated. The effects of CRT on repolarization were simulated in ECGSIM, a mathematical model of electrocardiogram genesis. TDR was calculated as the difference in repolarization time between the epicardial and endocardial nodes of the heart model. PATIENTS: The interval from the apex to the end of the T wave was shorter during biventricular pacing (102 +/- 18 ms) and LV pacing (106 +/- 21 ms) than during RV pacing (117 +/- 22 ms, P < or =.005). T-wave amplitude and area were low during biventricular pacing (287 +/- 125 microV and 56 +/- 22 microV.s, respectively, P = .0006 vs RV pacing). T-wave complexity was high during biventricular pacing (0.42 +/- 0.26, P = .004 vs RV pacing). Simulations: Repolarization patterns were highly similar to the preceding depolarization patterns. The repolarization patterns of different pacing modes explained the observed magnitudes of the ECG repolarization indices. Average and local TDR were not different between pacing modes.
CONCLUSION: In patients treated with CRT, ECG repolarization indices are related to pacing-induced activation sequences rather than transmural dispersion. TDR during biventricular and LV pacing is not larger than TDR during conventional RV endocardial pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16360079     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  10 in total

1.  Nondipolar content of T wave derived from a myocardial source simulation with increased repolarization inhomogeneity.

Authors:  Milos Kesek; Ola Gustavsson; Urban Wiklund
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Optimization of repolarization during biventricular pacing: a new target in patients with biventricular devices?

Authors:  Cengizhan Türkoğlu; Farid Aliyev; Cengiz Celiker; Gökhan Cetin; Gökhan Alici; Işil Uzunhasan; Inci Firatli
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  Cellular basis for the repolarization waves of the ECG.

Authors:  Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  An electrocardiographic sign of ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Loek P B Meijs; Loriano Galeotti; Esther P Pueyo; Daniel Romero; Robert B Jennings; Michael Ringborn; Stafford G Warren; Galen S Wagner; David G Strauss
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Assessment of the Spatial QRS-T Angle by Vectorcardiography: Current Data and Perspectives.

Authors:  Christina Voulgari; Nicholas Tentolouris
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-11

Review 6.  The ECG vertigo in diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy.

Authors:  Christina Voulgari; Nicholas Tentolouris; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Exp Diabetes Res       Date:  2011-05-29

Review 7.  The spatial QRS-T angle: implications in clinical practice.

Authors:  Christina Voulgari; Stamatina Pagoni; Solomon Tesfaye; Nicholas Tentolouris
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2013-08

8.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on ventricular repolarization: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu Duan; Wei Gao
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 9.  Computational Modeling for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Angela W C Lee; Caroline Mendonca Costa; Marina Strocchi; Christopher A Rinaldi; Steven A Niederer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Electrocardiographic spatial QRS-T angle and incident cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected patients (from the Strategies for the Management of Antiretroviral Therapy [SMART] study).

Authors:  Farah Z Dawood; Faraaz Khan; Mollie P Roediger; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Shobha Swaminathan; Hartwig Klinker; Jennifer Hoy; Jens D Lundgren; James D Neaton; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.778

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.