Literature DB >> 19419331

A Multicenter, double-blind trial of a high-dose caspofungin treatment regimen versus a standard caspofungin treatment regimen for adult patients with invasive candidiasis.

Robert F Betts1, Marcio Nucci, Deepak Talwar, Marcelo Gareca, Flavio Queiroz-Telles, Roger J Bedimo, Raoul Herbrecht, Guillermo Ruiz-Palacios, Jo-Anne H Young, John W Baddley, Kim M Strohmaier, Kimberly A Tucker, Arlene F Taylor, Nicholas A Kartsonis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard caspofungin treatment regimen (50 mg/day after a 70-mg dose on day 1) is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, but experience with higher doses of caspofungin is limited. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of caspofungin at 3 times the standard dosing regimen.
METHODS: Patients with proven invasive candidiasis were randomized to receive a standard or high-dose (150 mg/day) caspofungin treatment regimen. Safety was assessed in all patients as treated. Efficacy was assessed as a secondary objective in a full-analysis-set population. A favorable overall response was defined as symptom resolution and microbiological clearance at the end of caspofungin therapy.
RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included in the safety analysis (104 received the standard regimen, and 100 received the high-dose regimen), and 197 were included in the efficacy analysis (102 and 95 in the standard and high-dose treatment groups, respectively). Patient demographic characteristics, neutropenia status (6.7% and 8.0% had neutropenia, respectively), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (mean, 16.5 and 17, respectively) were similar between treatment groups. Significant drug-related adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients receiving the standard regimen and 3.0% of patients receiving the high-dose regimen (difference, 1.1%; 95% confidence interval, -4.1% to 6.8%). The most-common drug-related adverse events in the standard and high-dose treatment groups were phlebitis (3.8% and 2.0%, respectively), increased alkaline phosphatase level (6.9% and 2.0%, respectively), and increased aspartate transaminase level (4.0% and 2.0%, respectively). Overall, 71.6% of patients who received the standard regimen and 77.9% of patients who received the high-dose regimen had favorable overall responses (difference, 6.3%; 95% confidence interval, -5.9% to 18.4%; not statistically significant). Mortality at 8 weeks after therapy was similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Both caspofungin dosing regimens were effective and well tolerated in patients with invasive candidiasis. No safety concerns were found for caspofungin at a dosage of 150 mg/day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19419331     DOI: 10.1086/598933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  68 in total

1.  Efficacy of caspofungin as salvage therapy for invasive aspergillosis compared to standard therapy in a historical cohort.

Authors:  J W Hiemenz; I I Raad; J A Maertens; R Y Hachem; A J Saah; C A Sable; J A Chodakewitz; M E Severino; P Saddier; R S Berman; D M Ryan; M J Dinubile; T F Patterson; D W Denning; T J Walsh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  [Strategies for antifungal treatment failure in intensive care units].

Authors:  C Arens; M Bernhard; C Koch; A Heininger; D Störzinger; T Hoppe-Tichy; M Hecker; B Grabein; M A Weigand; C Lichtenstern
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Pharmacokinetics of Caspofungin in Critically Ill Patients in Relation to Liver Dysfunction: Differential Impact of Plasma Albumin and Bilirubin Levels.

Authors:  S Kurland; M Furebring; E Löwdin; E Eliasson; E I Nielsen; J Sjölin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Frequency of decreased susceptibility and resistance to echinocandins among fluconazole-resistant bloodstream isolates of Candida glabrata.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M Castanheira; S R Lockhart; A M Ahlquist; S A Messer; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Essentials in Candida bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Sibylle C Mellinghoff; O A Cornely; N Jung
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Update on invasive opportunistic mycoses: clinical trials review, 2008-2009.

Authors:  Andreas H Groll
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events for echinocandins.

Authors:  Eckhard Müller; Jiun-Ling Wang; Chia-Hsuin Chang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Paradoxical effect of caspofungin against Candida bloodstream isolates is mediated by multiple pathways but eliminated in human serum.

Authors:  Ryan K Shields; M Hong Nguyen; Chen Du; Ellen Press; Shaoji Cheng; Cornelius J Clancy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pros and Cons of Extrapolating Animal Data on Antifungal Pharmacodynamics to Humans.

Authors:  Scott W Mueller; Tyree H Kiser
Journal:  Curr Fungal Infect Rep       Date:  2011-03-26

10.  Impact of Loading Dose of Caspofungin in Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment for Severe Candidiasis Infections in Patients in Intensive Care Units: the CASPOLOAD Study.

Authors:  Sébastien Bailly; Elodie Gautier-Veyret; Minh P Lê; Lila Bouadma; Olivier Andremont; Mathilde Neuville; Bruno Mourvillier; Romain Sonneville; Eric Magalhaes; Jordane Lebut; Aguila Radjou; Roland Smonig; Michel Wolff; Laurent Massias; Claire Dupuis; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.