Literature DB >> 19418862

Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays.

Bernd Wöstmann1, Peter Rehmann, Markus Balkenhol.   

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the accuracy resulting from dual-arch impressions when compared to conventional impressions in complex preparations (ie, inlay and partial crown). One hundred eighty impressions were made using two different dual-arch trays; conventional trays served as the control. The accuracy of the dies obtained (Fuji-Rock EP, GC Europe) was assessed indirectly from the change of 59 transversal dimensions. Statistical analysis (t test, analysis of variance) revealed that less rigid dual-arch trays performed better than rigid ones. Though the inlay preparation was more difficult to reproduce with dual-arch trays, it can be concluded that the accuracy obtainable with nonrigid dual-arch trays is comparable to impressions taken from full-arch trays.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19418862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  9 in total

1.  In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.

Authors:  Andreas Ender; Moritz Zimmermann; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners.

Authors:  Sebastian B M Patzelt; Archontia Emmanouilidi; Susanne Stampf; Joerg R Strub; Wael Att
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of material surface on the scanning error of a powder-free 3D measuring system.

Authors:  Michael Kurz; Thomas Attin; Albert Mehl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  In vivo Study of the Accuracy of Dual-arch Impressions.

Authors:  Luciana Martinelli Santayana de Lima; Gilberto Antonio Borges; Luiz Henrique Burnett Junior; Ana Maria Spohr
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

5.  Clinical acceptance of single-unit crowns and its association with impression and tissue displacement techniques: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Lawson; Mark S Litaker; Ellen Sowell; Valeria V Gordan; Rahma Mungia; Kenneth R Ronzo; Ba T Lam; Gregg H Gilbert; Michael S McCracken
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Comparison of the accuracy of digitally fabricated polyurethane model and conventional gypsum model.

Authors:  So-Yeun Kim; So-Hyoun Lee; Seong-Keun Cho; Chang-Mo Jeong; Young-Chan Jeon; Mi-Jung Yun; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  Accuracy of 3D white light scanning of abutment teeth impressions: evaluation of trueness and precision.

Authors:  Jin-Hun Jeon; Hae-Young Kim; Ji-Hwan Kim; Woong-Chul Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Repeatability and reproducibility of individual abutment impression, assessed with a blue light scanner.

Authors:  Jin-Hun Jeon; Dong-Yeon Kim; Jae-Jun Lee; Ji-Hwan Kim; Woong-Chul Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Effect of posterior span length on the trueness and precision of 3 intraoral digital scanners: A comparative 3-dimensional in vitro study.

Authors:  Mohamed Fattouh; Laila Mohamed Mohamed Kenawi; Hesham Fattouh
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-08-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.