Literature DB >> 19417603

Extraneural versus intraneural stimulation thresholds during ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block.

Paul E Bigeleisen1, Nizar Moayeri, Gerbrand J Groen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A stimulation current of no more than 0.5 mA is regarded as safe in avoiding nerve injury and delivering adequate stimulus to provoke a motor response. However, there is no consistent level of stimulating threshold that reliably indicates intraneural placement of the needle. The authors determined the minimally required stimulation threshold to elicit a motor response outside and inside the most superficial part of the brachial plexus during high-resolution, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block.
METHODS: After institutional review board approval, ultrasound-guided, supraclavicular block was performed on 55 patients. Patients with neurologic dysfunction were excluded. Criteria for extraneural and intraneural stimulation were defined and assessed by independent experts. To determine success rate and any residual neurologic deficit, qualitative sensory and motor examinations were performed before and after block placement. At 6 month follow-up, the patients were examined for any neurologic deficit.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients met all set stimulation criteria. Median +/- SD (interquartile range) minimum stimulation threshold outside was 0.60 +/- 0.37 mA (0.40, 1.0) and inside 0.30 +/- 0.19 mA (0.20, 0.40). The difference of 0.30 mA was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Stimulation currents of 0.2 mA or less were not observed outside the trunk in any patient. Significantly higher thresholds were observed in diabetic patients. Success rate was 100% after 20 min. Thirty-four patients had normal sensory and motor examination at 6 months. Five patients were lost to follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study and the use of ultrasound, a stimulation current of 0.2 mA or less is reliable to detect intraneural placement of the needle. Furthermore, stimulation currents of more than 0.2 and no more than 0.5 mA could not rule out intraneural position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19417603     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a59891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  21 in total

Review 1.  [Complications of peripheral regional anesthesia].

Authors:  M Neuburger; J Büttner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Detection of intraneural needle-placement with multiple frequency bioimpedance monitoring: a novel method.

Authors:  Håvard Kalvøy; Axel R Sauter
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Nerve injury after peripheral nerve blockade-current understanding and guidelines.

Authors:  D O'Flaherty; C J L McCartney; S C Ng
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2018-10-26

Review 4.  [Localization of peripheral nerves. Success and safety with electrical nerve stimulation].

Authors:  M Neuburger; U Schwemmer; T Volk; W Gogarten; P Kessler; T Steinfeldt
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [Electrical nerve stimulation for peripheral nerve blocks. Ultrasound-guided needle positioning and effect of 5% glucose injection].

Authors:  M Habicher; M Ocken; J Birnbaum; T Volk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Nerve localization for peripheral regional anesthesia. Recommendations of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  T Steinfeldt; U Schwemmer; T Volk; M Neuburger; T Wiesmann; A R Heller; O Vicent; A Stanek; M Franz; H Wulf; P Kessler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Ultrasound-guided central cluster approach for the supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a case series.

Authors:  Mi Geum Lee; Kyung Cheon Lee; Hong Soon Kim; Seol Ju Park; Young Je Suh; Hyeon Ju Shin
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-25

8.  [Differences of analgesic efficacy and complication rates between ultrasound and nervestimulator guided peripheral nerve catheters : Database analysis on patient-relevant target parameters].

Authors:  A Schnabel; B Middendorf; M G Boschin; A Gottschalk; H Van Aken; P K Zahn; E M Pogatzki-Zahn
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 9.  [Ultrasound-guided peripheral regional anesthesia : placement and dosage of local anesthetics].

Authors:  G Gorsewski; A Dinse-Lambracht; I Tugtekin; A Gauss
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Interventional multispectral photoacoustic imaging with a clinical ultrasound probe for discriminating nerves and tendons: an ex vivo pilot study.

Authors:  Jean Martial Mari; Wenfeng Xia; Simeon J West; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.170

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.