PURPOSE: Chromosomal instability, as assessed by many techniques, including DNA content aneuploidy, loss of heterozygosity, and comparative genomic hybridization, has consistently been reported to be common in cancer and rare in normal tissues. Recently, a panel of chromosome instability biomarkers, including loss of heterozygosity and DNA content, has been reported to identify patients at high and low risk of progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA), but required multiple platforms for implementation. Although chromosomal instability involving amplifications and deletions of chromosome regions have been observed in nearly all cancers, copy number alterations (CNA) in premalignant tissues have not been well characterized or evaluated in cohort studies as biomarkers of cancer risk. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined CNAs in 98 patients having either BE or EA using Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) array comparative genomic hybridization to characterize CNAs at different stages of progression ranging from early BE to advanced EA. RESULTS: CNAs were rare in early stages (less than high-grade dysplasia) but were progressively more frequent and larger in later stages (high-grade dysplasia and EA), including high-level amplifications. The number of CNAs correlated highly with DNA content aneuploidy. Patients whose biopsies contained CNAs involving >70 Mbp were at increased risk of progression to DNA content abnormalities or EA (hazards ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-14.8; P = 0.0047), and the risk increased as more of the genome was affected. CONCLUSIONS: Genome-wide analysis of CNAs provides a common platform for the evaluation of chromosome instability for cancer risk assessment as well as for the identification of common regions of alteration that can be further studied for biomarker discovery.
PURPOSE: Chromosomal instability, as assessed by many techniques, including DNA content aneuploidy, loss of heterozygosity, and comparative genomic hybridization, has consistently been reported to be common in cancer and rare in normal tissues. Recently, a panel of chromosome instability biomarkers, including loss of heterozygosity and DNA content, has been reported to identify patients at high and low risk of progression from Barrett's esophagus (BE) to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA), but required multiple platforms for implementation. Although chromosomal instability involving amplifications and deletions of chromosome regions have been observed in nearly all cancers, copy number alterations (CNA) in premalignant tissues have not been well characterized or evaluated in cohort studies as biomarkers of cancer risk. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined CNAs in 98 patients having either BE or EA using Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) array comparative genomic hybridization to characterize CNAs at different stages of progression ranging from early BE to advanced EA. RESULTS: CNAs were rare in early stages (less than high-grade dysplasia) but were progressively more frequent and larger in later stages (high-grade dysplasia and EA), including high-level amplifications. The number of CNAs correlated highly with DNA content aneuploidy. Patients whose biopsies contained CNAs involving >70 Mbp were at increased risk of progression to DNA content abnormalities or EA (hazards ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-14.8; P = 0.0047), and the risk increased as more of the genome was affected. CONCLUSIONS: Genome-wide analysis of CNAs provides a common platform for the evaluation of chromosome instability for cancer risk assessment as well as for the identification of common regions of alteration that can be further studied for biomarker discovery.
Authors: M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-07-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: T G Schnell; S J Sontag; G Chejfec; G Aranha; A Metz; S O'Connell; U J Seidel; A Sonnenberg Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: W El-Rifai; H F Frierson ; C A Moskaluk; J C Harper; G R Petroni; E A Bissonette; D R Jones; S Knuutila; S M Powell Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: A K Walch; H F Zitzelsberger; J Bruch; G Keller; D Angermeier; M M Aubele; J Mueller; H Stein; H Braselmann; J R Siewert; H Höfler; M Werner Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: E Montgomery; M P Bronner; J R Goldblum; J K Greenson; M M Haber; J Hart; L W Lamps; G Y Lauwers; A J Lazenby; D N Lewin; M E Robert; A Y Toledano; Y Shyr; K Washington Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: K K Wang; J M Tian; E Gorospe; J Penfield; G Prasad; T Goddard; M Wongkeesong; N S Buttar; L Lutzke; S Krishnadath Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 3.429
Authors: Panteleimon Kountourakis; Jaffer A Ajani; Marta Davila; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Julie G Izzo Journal: Gastrointest Cancer Res Date: 2012-03
Authors: Rom S Leidner; Lakshmeswari Ravi; Patrick Leahy; Yanwen Chen; Beth Bednarchik; Mirte Streppel; Marcia Canto; Jean S Wang; Anirban Maitra; Joseph Willis; Sanford D Markowitz; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Mark D Adams; Amitabh Chak; Kishore Guda Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 5.006