Literature DB >> 19416768

Assessment of arterial blood pressure during support with an axial flow left ventricular assist device.

Timothy J Myers1, Mathius Bolmers, Igor D Gregoric, Biswajit Kar, O H Howard Frazier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Axial-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have a number of advantages over pulsatile LVADs, including their small size and better durability. Although the design of axial-flow pumps should result in fewer serious complications during support, some adverse events persist. Thus, optimizing patient treatment may minimize complications, allowing broader acceptance of these devices. In this study, we analyzed standard blood pressure measurements obtained by cuff and arterial lines and used these values to help establish guidelines for the safe operation of axial-flow LVADs.
METHODS: The study included 35 heart failure patients who had received a Jarvik 2000 (Jarvik Heart Inc, New York, NY) axial-flow LVAD as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Blood pressure and echocardiographic data were collected during speed-change studies.
RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure did not change, but diastolic, mean, and pulse pressure values changed significantly with changes in pump speed (p < 0.0001). When blood pressure values obtained from an arterial line were compared with those from an automated cuff machine, the systolic, diastolic, and mean values did not correlate (p < 0.05), but the calculated pulse pressures did (p = 0.33). A pulse pressure calculation of < 15 mm Hg resulted in aortic valve opening 24% of the time, and a pulse pressure > 15 mm Hg was predictive of aortic valve opening 65% of the time.
CONCLUSIONS: Because aortic valve opening minimizes the risk of complications, a safe zone for most patients is a pulse pressure > 15 mm Hg. Arterial blood pressure changes during axial-flow LVAD support can be predicted and may be used as a guide for the proper management of pump speed settings. A calculated pulse pressure from an arterial line or automated cuff may be used to determine a safe zone of Jarvik 2000 operation, leading to fewer complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19416768     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Patients with implanted ventricular assist devices : Challenge for emergency medicine].

Authors:  M Bunz; C Kerscher; M Foltan; L Rupprecht; B M Graf; Y A Zausig
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  A Physical Heart Failure Simulation System Utilizing the Total Artificial Heart and Modified Donovan Mock Circulation.

Authors:  Jessica R Crosby; Katrina J DeCook; Phat L Tran; Edward Betterton; Richard G Smith; Douglas F Larson; Zain I Khalpey; Daniel Burkhoff; Marvin J Slepian
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 3.  Coagulopathy in Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Fine Balance.

Authors:  Julie L Rosenthal; Randall C Starling
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Evaluating heart failure after implantation of mechanical circulatory support devices.

Authors:  Keyur B Shah; Daniel G Tang; Richard H Cooke; Michael C Kontos; Neil P Lewis; Gundars J Katlaps; Michael L Hess; Vigneshwar Kasirajan
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-03

Review 5.  [Recommendations for emergency management of patients with permanent mechanical circulatory support : Consensus statement of DGTHG, DIVI, DGIIN, DGAI, DGINA, DGfK and DGK].

Authors:  Kevin Pilarczyk; Udo Boeken; Andreas Beckmann; Andreas Markewitz; P Christian Schulze; Martin Pin; Ingo Gräff; Sebastian Schmidt; Birk Runge; Hans-Jörg Busch; Michael R Preusch; Nils Haake; Gereon Schälte; Jan Gummert; Guido Michels
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: shared care goals of monitoring and treating patients.

Authors:  Jerry D Estep; Barry H Trachtenberg; Laurie P Loza; Brian A Bruckner
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  Assessment of myocardial viability and left ventricular function in patients supported by a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Deepak K Gupta; Hicham Skali; Jose Rivero; Patricia Campbell; Leslie Griffin; Colleen Smith; Courtney Foster; Brian Claggett; Robert J Glynn; Gregory Couper; Michael M Givertz; Mandeep R Mehra; Marcelo Di Carli; Scott D Solomon; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Cannula Tip With Integrated Volume Sensor for Rotary Blood Pump Control: Early-Stage Development.

Authors:  Joshua Cysyk; Ray Newswanger; Eric Popjes; Walter Pae; Choon-Sik Jhun; Jenelle Izer; William Weiss; Gerson Rosenberg
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 9.  Expanding the Scope of Multimodality Imaging in Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Zaid I Almarzooq; Anubodh S Varshney; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Manan Pareek; Garrick C Stewart; Jerry D Estep; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-18

10.  Computational fluid dynamic analysis to prevent aortic root and valve clots during left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Michael Poullis
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.