Literature DB >> 19413397

Frictional resistance in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets. A systematic review.

Sayeh Ehsani1, Marie-Alice Mandich, Tarek H El-Bialy, Carlos Flores-Mir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the amount of expressed frictional resistance between orthodontic self-ligating brackets and conventionally ligated brackets in vitro as reported in the literature.
METHODS: Several electronic databases (Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched without limits. In vitro studies that addressed friction of self-ligating brackets compared with conventionally ligated brackets were selected and reviewed. In addition, a search was performed by going through the reference lists of the selected articles to identify any paper that could have been missed by the electronic searches.
RESULTS: A total of 70 papers from the electronic database searches and 3 papers from the secondary search were initially obtained. After applying the selection criteria, only 19 papers were included in this review. A wide range of methods were applied.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional brackets, self-ligating brackets produce lower friction when coupled with small round archwires in the absence of tipping and/or torque in an ideally aligned arch. Sufficient evidence was not found to claim that with large rectangular wires, in the presence of tipping and/or torque and in arches with considerable malocclusion, self-ligating brackets produce lower friction compared with conventional brackets.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19413397     DOI: 10.2319/060208-288.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  35 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of anchorage loss between self-ligating appliance and Conventional pre-adjusted edgewise appliance using sliding mechanics - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Pankaj Juneja; G Shivaprakash; S S Chopra; P B Kambalyal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-04-03

2.  Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.

Authors:  Maria Regina Guerra Monteiro; Licinio Esmeraldo da Silva; Carlos Nelson Elias; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.

Authors:  André da Costa Monini; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior; Alexandre Protásio Vianna; Renato Parsekian Martins
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Evaluation of friction in orthodontics using various brackets and archwire combinations-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sujeet Kumar; Shamsher Singh; Rani Hamsa P R; Sameer Ahmed; Apoorva Bhatnagar; Manreet Sidhu; Pramod Shetty
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

5.  Ceramic brackets and low friction : A possible synergy in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning.

Authors:  Matteo Camporesi; Mariana Bulhoes Galvão; André Tortamano; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Nicolò Defraia; Efisio Defraia; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review.

Authors:  Xianrui Yang; Chaoran Xue; Yiruo He; Mengyuan Zhao; Mengqi Luo; Peiqi Wang; Ding Bai
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists.

Authors:  Chase Prettyman; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional edgewise twin brackets: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kristina Johansson; Fredrik Lundström
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Maxillary canine retraction with self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Maurício Mezomo; Eduardo S de Lima; Luciane Macedo de Menezes; André Weissheimer; Susiane Allgayer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Active and passive self-ligation-a myth?

Authors:  Lorenz M Brauchli; Christiane Senn; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.