OBJECTIVE: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important indicator of public health. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) includes nine HRQOL items that can be used to monitor the health status of the nation. The objective of this study was to examine the numerical relationships among these HRQOL items to develop summary scores by combining items. METHODS: Using 2001 and 2002 BRFSS data from states that included all nine HRQOL questions, factor analyses were performed to determine whether the items would group together into multi-item scales. RESULTS: Two factors emerged, corresponding conceptually to a physical health construct and a mental health construct. The resulting scales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and ability to distinguish between population subgroups known to differ on HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for condensing the BRFSS core and optional HRQOL questions into two scales. These scales provide more complete information about physical and mental HRQOL than is available from single items, while limiting the number of individual variables required for a given analysis. However, the four core HRQOL questions focus primarily on physical health. Thus, the five supplemental questions should be included when measuring mental health is of interest.
OBJECTIVE: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important indicator of public health. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) includes nine HRQOL items that can be used to monitor the health status of the nation. The objective of this study was to examine the numerical relationships among these HRQOL items to develop summary scores by combining items. METHODS: Using 2001 and 2002 BRFSS data from states that included all nine HRQOL questions, factor analyses were performed to determine whether the items would group together into multi-item scales. RESULTS: Two factors emerged, corresponding conceptually to a physical health construct and a mental health construct. The resulting scales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and ability to distinguish between population subgroups known to differ on HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for condensing the BRFSS core and optional HRQOL questions into two scales. These scales provide more complete information about physical and mental HRQOL than is available from single items, while limiting the number of individual variables required for a given analysis. However, the four core HRQOL questions focus primarily on physical health. Thus, the five supplemental questions should be included when measuring mental health is of interest.
Authors: E M Gentry; W D Kalsbeek; G C Hogelin; J T Jones; K L Gaines; M R Forman; J S Marks; F L Trowbridge Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 1985 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Earl S Ford; David M Mannino; David M Homa; Charon Gwynn; Stephen C Redd; David G Moriarty; Ali H Mokdad Journal: Chest Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Celina Maria Turchi Martelli; Nazareth Elias Nascimento; Jose A Suaya; Joao Bosco Siqueira; Wayner Vieira Souza; Marilia Dalva Turchi; Adriana Oliveira Guilarde; Joao Borges Peres; Donald S Shepard Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Willi Horner-Johnson; Rie Suzuki; Gloria L Krahn; Elena M Andresen; Charles E Drum Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Karla I Galaviz; Paul A Estabrooks; Edtna Jauregui Ulloa; Rebecca E Lee; Ian Janssen; Juan López Y Taylor; Luis Ortiz-Hernández; Lucie Lévesque Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Sanjay Basu; Rita Hamad; Justin S White; Sepideh Modrek; David H Rehkopf; Mark R Cullen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 2.692