Literature DB >> 19412954

Long-term effects of pallidal or subthalamic deep brain stimulation on quality of life in Parkinson's disease.

Jens Volkmann1, Alberto Albanese, Jaime Kulisevsky, Aana-Lena Tornqvist, Jean-Luc Houeto, Bernard Pidoux, Anne-Marie Bonnet, Alexandre Mendes, Alim-Louis Benabid, Valerie Fraix, Nadege Van Blercom, Jing Xie, José Obeso, Maria Cruz Rodriguez-Oroz, Jurge Guridi, Alfons Schnitzler, Lars Timmermann, Alexandre A Gironell, Juan Molet, Benta Pascual-Sedano, Stig Rehncrona, Elena Moro, Anthony C Lang, Andres M Lozano, Anna Rita Bentivoglio, Massimo Scerrati, Maria Fiorella Contarino, Luigi Romito, Marc Janssens, Yves Agid.   

Abstract

We assessed the effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) or internal pallidum (GPi-DBS) on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease participating in a previously reported multicenter trial. Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) questionnaires were available for analysis in a subgroup of n = 20/20 patients with GPi-DBS and n = 45/49 patients with STN-DBS at baseline, 6 and 36 months. The SIP provides a physical dimension and a psychosocial dimension sum score and 12 category scores: Alertness/Intellectual Behavior (AIB), Ambulation (A), Body Care and Movement (BCM), Communication (C), Eating (E), Emotional Behavior (EB), Home Management (HM), Mobility (M), Recreation and Pastimes (RP), Sleep and Rest (SR), Social Interaction (SI), and Work (W). Motor functioning was assessed by means of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and diaries. At 6 months significant improvements in off-period motor symptoms and activities of daily living were paralleled by significant reductions in the total, physical, and psychosocial SIP score in both treatment groups. At 3 years, sustained improvements were observed in the physical dimension score, BCM, E, M, RP after STN-DBS and M, SI after GPi-DBS. All other SIP subscores approached baseline values, but were still the same or better (except C) whereas motor functioning remained stable after 36 months. STN-DBS and GPi-DBS led to significant early improvements in HrQoL. Despite sustained motor improvements many of these initial benefits were lost after 3 years. This may reflect either progression of the disease or adaptive changes in the subjective perception of health-related wellbeing over time. (c) 2009 Movement Disorder Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19412954     DOI: 10.1002/mds.22496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Disord        ISSN: 0885-3185            Impact factor:   10.338


  39 in total

1.  A meta-regression of the long-term effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and gait in PD.

Authors:  R J St George; J G Nutt; K J Burchiel; F B Horak
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Randomized trial of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: thirty-six-month outcomes.

Authors:  Frances M Weaver; Kenneth A Follett; Matthew Stern; Ping Luo; Crystal L Harris; Kwan Hur; William J Marks; Johannes Rothlind; Oren Sagher; Claudia Moy; Rajesh Pahwa; Kim Burchiel; Penelope Hogarth; Eugene C Lai; John E Duda; Kathryn Holloway; Ali Samii; Stacy Horn; Jeff M Bronstein; Gatana Stoner; Philip A Starr; Richard Simpson; Gordon Baltuch; Antonio De Salles; Grant D Huang; Domenic J Reda
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Nonmotor outcomes in Parkinson's disease: is deep brain stimulation better than dopamine replacement therapy?

Authors:  Rupam Borgohain; Rukmini Mridula Kandadai; Afshan Jabeen; Meena A Kannikannan
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.570

4.  Commentary: the pedunculopontine nucleus: clinical experience, basic questions and future directions.

Authors:  P Mazzone; E Scarnati; E Garcia-Rill
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  [Long-term effects of deep brain stimulation for movement disorders: a literature-based analysis].

Authors:  O Eberhardt; T Reithmeier; H Topka
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Suppressing bursting synchronization in a modular neuronal network with synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  JiaYi Wang; XiaoLi Yang; ZhongKui Sun
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 7.  [Long-term care after deep brain stimulation of patients with Parkinson's disease].

Authors:  F Sixel-Döring; G Ebersbach
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 8.  Current Practice and the Future of Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Leonardo Almeida; Wissam Deeb; Chauncey Spears; Enrico Opri; Rene Molina; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Aysegul Gunduz; Christopher W Hess; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.420

9.  DBS amplitude setting can improve aspects of quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Marek Baláž; Martina Bočková; Ivan Rektor
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Stimulation-Induced Transient Nonmotor Psychiatric Symptoms following Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Association with Clinical Outcomes and Neuroanatomical Correlates.

Authors:  Osama A Abulseoud; Aimen Kasasbeh; Hoon-Ki Min; Julie A Fields; Susannah J Tye; Stephan Goerss; Emily J Knight; Shirlene M Sampson; Bryan T Klassen; Joseph Y Matsumoto; Cynthia Stoppel; Kendall H Lee; Mark A Frye
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.