Literature DB >> 19412322

Perception of Food Amounts by Chimpanzees Based on the Number, Size, Contour Length and Visibility of Items.

Michael J Beran1, Theodore A Evans, Emily H Harris.   

Abstract

Nonhuman animals reliably select the largest of two or more sets of discrete items, particularly if those items are food items. However, many studies of these numerousness judgments fail to control for confounds between amount of food e.g., mass or volume) and number of food items. Stimulus dimensions other than number of items also may play a role in how animals perceive sets and make choices. Four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) completed a variety of tasks that involved comparisons of food items (graham crackers) that varied in terms of their number, size, and orientation. In Experiment 1, chimpanzees chose between two alternative sets of visible cracker pieces. In Experiment 2, the experimenters presented one set of crackers in a vertical orientation (stacked) and the other in a horizontal orientation. In Experiment 3, the experimenters presented all food items one-at-a-time by dropping them into opaque containers. Chimpanzees succeeded overall in choosing the largest amount of food. They did not rely on number or contour length as cues when making these judgments but instead primarily responded to the total amount of food in the sets. However, some errors reflected choices of the set with the smaller total amount of food but the individually largest single food item. Thus, responses were not optimal because of biases that were not related to the total amount of food in the sets.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19412322      PMCID: PMC2493292          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  34 in total

1.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  E M Brannon; H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2000-01

2.  Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count?

Authors:  Rebecca E West; Robert J Young
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations.

Authors:  Fei Xu
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-08

4.  Ordinal judgments and summation of nonvisible sets of food items by two chimpanzees and a rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Mary M Beran; Emily H Harris; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-07

5.  Quantity discrimination in female mosquitofish.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Marco Dadda; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-05

7.  Salamanders ( Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian.

Authors:  Claudia Uller; Robert Jaeger; Gena Guidry; Carolyn Martin
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 8.  Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet.

Authors:  John M C Hutchinson; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  M J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Evolutionary foundations of number: spontaneous representation of numerical magnitudes by cotton-top tamarins.

Authors:  Marc D Hauser; Fritz Tsao; Patricia Garcia; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  36 in total

1.  When in doubt, chimpanzees rely on estimates of past reward amounts.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Emily H Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Gonadal hormones modulate sex differences in judgments of relative numerousness in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus.

Authors:  Michael H Ferkin; Andrew A Pierce; Robert O Sealand
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  Quantitative abilities in a reptile (Podarcis sicula).

Authors:  Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Isabel Fraccaroli; Francesco Gariboldi; Christian Agrillo; Angelo Bisazza; Cristiano Bertolucci; Augusto Foà
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  More evidence that less is better: Sub-optimal choice in dogs.

Authors:  Rebecca J Chase; David N George
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The rewarding effects of number and surface area of food in rats.

Authors:  Devina Wadhera; Lynn M Wilkie; Elizabeth D Capaldi-Phillips
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Giraffes go for more: a quantity discrimination study in giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis).

Authors:  Montserrat Colell; Federica Amici; Alvaro L Caicoya; Ruben Holland; Conrad Ensenyat
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Charles R Menzel
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Perception of food amounts by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the role of magnitude, contiguity, and wholeness.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Chasity L Ratliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

9.  Learning how to "make a deal": human (Homo sapiens) and monkey (Macaca mulatta) performance when repeatedly faced with the Monty Hall Dilemma.

Authors:  Emily D Klein; Theodore A Evans; Natasha B Schultz; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, respond differently to the scent marks of multiple male conspecifics.

Authors:  Michael H Ferkin; Nicholas J Hobbs
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.