Literature DB >> 19411096

Mortality rates due to gynecologic cancers in New York state by demographic factors and proximity to a Gynecologic Oncology Group member treatment center: 1979-2001.

Wei Tan1, Frederick B Stehman, Randy L Carter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe trends in mortality rates, in New York State, due to cervical, endometrial and ovarian cancer and to assess how these rates varied with proximity to a comprehensive cancer treatment center or population density (rural/urban).
METHODS: Data were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s Compressed Mortality Files, Census Bureau records, and online maps. Poisson regression models were fitted to estimate death rates (mean number of deaths per 100,000 women per year) due to gynecologic cancer type. Trends in death rates were compared with respect to driving time to the nearest comprehensive cancer treatment center and population density, controlling for race, county income level, and age at death.
RESULTS: Cervical and endometrial but not ovarian death rates declined over time. For both cervical and endometrial cancers, death rates varied significantly with driving time and between rural and urban counties. In the case of cervical cancer, the decline over time was steeper in rural than in urban counties. For endometrial cancer, the decline steepened with increasing distance from a treatment center.
CONCLUSION: Improvements in cervical and endometrial cancer mortality from 1979 to 2001 followed increases in gynecologic cancer treatment research efforts, number of specialists trained to treat such cases, and in the emphasis on gynecologic cancer in the training of physicians in general. Our results are consistent with an interpretation that the progressive actions by leaders in the gynecologic oncology profession during the late 1960's and early 1970's contributed to improvements in mortality rates in subsequent decades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19411096     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

1.  Rural-urban differences in surgical treatment, regional lymph node examination, and survival in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Katherine S Hyon; Paula Diaz-Sylvester; Sonya R Izadi; Graham A Colditz; Laurent Brard
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Rural-metropolitan disparities in ovarian cancer survival: a statewide population-based study.

Authors:  Jihye Park; Brenna E Blackburn; Kerry Rowe; John Snyder; Yuan Wan; Vikrant Deshmukh; Michael Newman; Alison Fraser; Ken Smith; Kim Herget; Lindsay Burt; Theresa Werner; David K Gaffney; Ana Maria Lopez; Kathi Mooney; Mia Hashibe
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Is distance to provider a barrier to care for medicaid patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer?

Authors:  John F Scoggins; Catherine R Fedorenko; Sara M A Donahue; Dedra Buchwald; David K Blough; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  A look at the gynecologic oncologist workforce - Are we meeting patient demand?

Authors:  Sarah A Ackroyd; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Bumyang Kim; Nita K Lee; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Changing Incidence of Uterine Cancer in Rural Egypt: Possible Impact of Nutritional and Epidemiologic Transitions.

Authors:  Saad Alshahrani; Ahmed Hablas; Robert M Chamberlain; Jane Meza; Steven Remmenga; Ibrahim A Seifeldin; Mohamed Ramadan; Amr S Soliman
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-07

6.  Real-World Impact of Survival by Period of Diagnosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Between 1990 and 2014.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Jun Wang; Jia-Yuan Sun; Zhen-Yu He; Wen-Wen Zhang; Juan Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Global, Regional, and National Burden of Endometrial Cancer, 1990-2017: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2017.

Authors:  Shuang Zhang; Ting-Ting Gong; Fang-Hua Liu; Yu-Ting Jiang; Hui Sun; Xiao-Xin Ma; Yu-Hong Zhao; Qi-Jun Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Socioeconomic position and survival after cervical cancer: influence of cancer stage, comorbidity and smoking among Danish women diagnosed between 2005 and 2010.

Authors:  E H Ibfelt; S K Kjær; C Høgdall; M Steding-Jessen; T K Kjær; M Osler; C Johansen; K Frederiksen; S O Dalton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Trends in incidence and survival outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer: 30-year national population-based registry in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ying-Cheng Chiang; Chi-An Chen; Chun-Ju Chiang; Tsui-Hsia Hsu; Ming-Chieh Lin; San-Lin You; Wen-Fang Cheng; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 10.  Disparities in Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Sudeshna Chatterjee; Divya Gupta; Thomas A Caputo; Kevin Holcomb
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.