OBJECTIVE: To compare pronuclear morphology (Z-score), day 3 embryo grade, and day 3 cell number in the prediction of successful implantation rates (IRs), including cycles in which all or none of the embryos implanted. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University-based IVF center. PATIENT(S): Four hundred twenty-six fresh IVF day 3 transfers of 852 embryos in women <36 years of age from January 2000 to December 2003 in whom all or none of the embryos implanted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Evaluation of Z-scores, embryo morphology, cell number, and IR. RESULT(S): Day 3 parameters were more predictive than Z-scores. When early parameters were poor (Z-score) but late parameters were both good, the IR was 38%, compared with 4% when the Z-score was good but the late parameters were poor. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo grading systems are useful in the prediction of embryo implantation. In particular, cell number and embryo grade are more predictive than Z-scores. Therefore, late parameters have a better prognostic value than Z-scores when selecting embryos for transfer. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To compare pronuclear morphology (Z-score), day 3 embryo grade, and day 3 cell number in the prediction of successful implantation rates (IRs), including cycles in which all or none of the embryos implanted. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University-based IVF center. PATIENT(S): Four hundred twenty-six fresh IVF day 3 transfers of 852 embryos in women <36 years of age from January 2000 to December 2003 in whom all or none of the embryos implanted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Evaluation of Z-scores, embryo morphology, cell number, and IR. RESULT(S): Day 3 parameters were more predictive than Z-scores. When early parameters were poor (Z-score) but late parameters were both good, the IR was 38%, compared with 4% when the Z-score was good but the late parameters were poor. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo grading systems are useful in the prediction of embryo implantation. In particular, cell number and embryo grade are more predictive than Z-scores. Therefore, late parameters have a better prognostic value than Z-scores when selecting embryos for transfer. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Alessia Nicoli; Francesco Capodanno; Lucia Moscato; Ilaria Rondini; Maria T Villani; Antonella Tuzio; Giovanni B La Sala Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 5.211
Authors: Alessia Nicoli; Stefano Palomba; Francesco Capodanno; Maria Fini; Angela Falbo; Giovanni Battista La Sala Journal: J Ovarian Res Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 4.234
Authors: Ana M Sanchez; Luca Pagliardini; Greta C Cermisoni; Laura Privitera; Sofia Makieva; Alessandra Alteri; Laura Corti; Elisa Rabellotti; Massimo Candiani; Paola Viganò Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2020-02-03
Authors: F Cirillo; P Patrizio; M Baccini; E Morenghi; C Ronchetti; L Cafaro; E Zannoni; A Baggiani; P E Levi-Setti Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-02-29 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Alessia Nicoli; Francesco Capodanno; Ilaria Rondini; Barbara Valli; Maria Teresa Villani; Daria Morini; Leonardo De Pascalis; Stefano Palomba; Giovanni Battista La Sala Journal: J Ovarian Res Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 4.234
Authors: Anat Hershko Klement; Michal Ovadia; Amir Wiser; Arie Berkovitz; Tal Shavit; Luba Nemerovsky; Yehudith Ghetler; Ilan Cohen; Adrian Shulman Journal: J Ovarian Res Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 4.234
Authors: Mohammad A Al Smadi; Mohamad Eid Hammadeh; Erich Solomayer; Osamah Batiha; Mohammad M Altalib; Mohammad Y Jahmani; Mohammad A Shboul; Bassam Nusair; Houda Amor Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 3.060