Literature DB >> 24390678

Embryo quality but not pronuclear score is associated with clinical pregnancy following IVF.

D S Berger1, A Zapantis, Z Merhi, J Younger, A J Polotsky, S K Jindal.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The association between pronuclear (PN) scoring of embryos from assisted reproductive technology (ART) and clinical pregnancy remains controversial. We hypothesized that embryos with PNs scored on the day of fertilization check offer better embryo selection on day 3 and higher CPR compared to non-PN scored embryos.
METHODS: Patients (19-46 years) undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles at Montefiore's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health between January 2006 and December 2009 were included in our study. We analyzed fresh day 3 cycles only with autologous oocytes and partner's fresh sperm (n = 344). A total of 1,899 embryos were included. We compared CPR from non-PN scored embryos (Group 1, n = 835) with PN scored embryos (Group 2, n = 1,064). Composite scores by patient were developed based on embryo disposition. We also assessed traditional embryo grading derived from cell number, fragmentation and cell symmetry. Data analysis included chi square and t test to determine if PN scoring was associated with improved CPR, and to compare the additional variables.
RESULTS: CPR between Group 1 and Group 2 were not different (p = 0.91). CPR was significantly associated with female age, number of mature oocytes retrieved, number of day 3 embryos and grade of embryos transferred on day 3 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: PN scoring was not associated with improved CPR in day 3 embryo transfers. Mean grade of transferred embryos continues to be a well-established, independent predictor of CPR. We conclude that further refinement of embryo grading by PN scoring is not beneficial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24390678      PMCID: PMC3947071          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0162-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  33 in total

1.  The value of pronuclear scoring for the success of IVF and ICSI-cycles.

Authors:  A K Ludwig; S Werner; K Diedrich; B Nitz; M Ludwig
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  The potential roles for embryotrophic ligands in preimplantation embryo development.

Authors:  Chris O'Neill
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Limited importance of pre-embryo pronuclear morphology (zygote score) in assisted reproduction outcome in the absence of embryo cryopreservation.

Authors:  Alessia Nicoli; Barbara Valli; Roberta Di Girolamo; Barbara Di Tommaso; Andrea Gallinelli; Giovanni B La Sala
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Zygote score and status 1 or 2 days after cleavage and assisted reproduction outcome.

Authors:  Cristina Alvarez; Roser Taronger; Carmen García-Garrido; Gaspar González de Merlo
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.561

5.  Developmental prognosis for zygotes based on pronuclear pattern: usefulness of pronuclear scoring.

Authors:  Gemma Arroyo; Anna Veiga; Josep Santaló; Pere Nolasc Barri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Reduction in exposure of human embryos outside the incubator enhances embryo quality and blastulation rate.

Authors:  Jun Qiang Zhang; Xiu Ling Li; Yuzhu Peng; Xirong Guo; Boon Chin Heng; Guo Qing Tong
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.828

7.  Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo quality in in vitro fertilization program.

Authors:  Magdalena Depa-Martynow; Piotr Jedrzejczak; Leszek Pawelczyk
Journal:  Folia Histochem Cytobiol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.698

8.  The limited importance of pronuclear scoring of human zygotes.

Authors:  Aidita N James; Sasha Hennessy; Brett Reggio; Klaus Wiemer; Frederick Larsen; Jacques Cohen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Relationship between pronuclear scoring and embryo quality and implantation potential in IVF-ET.

Authors:  Qun Liu; Guijin Zhu; Juan Hu; Yulan Wei; Xinling Ren; Hanwang Zhang; Yufeng Li; Lei Jin; Jing Yue
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-05-15

10.  Predictive value of embryo grading for embryos with known outcomes.

Authors:  Vanessa N Weitzman; Jennifer Schnee-Riesz; Claudio Benadiva; John Nulsen; Linda Siano; Donald Maier
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  10 in total

1.  The effect of serum and follicular fluid amyloid-associated protein levels on in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Hakan Timur; Nafiye Yimaz; Inci Kahyaoglu; Hasan Ali Inal; Salim Erkaya
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers.

Authors:  Julian A Gingold; Joseph A Lee; Jorge Rodriguez-Purata; Michael C Whitehouse; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Tanmoy Mukherjee; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  An artificial neural network for the prediction of assisted reproduction outcome.

Authors:  Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Abraham Pouliakis; Charalampos Siristatidis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Non-invasive methods for embryo selection.

Authors:  H N Sallam; N H Sallam; S H Sallam
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-06-27

5.  Reassessing the feasibility of the zygote score for predicting embryo viability in IVF/ICSI using the GnRH antagonist protocol compared to the long protocol.

Authors:  Pin-Yao Lin; Fu-Jen Huang; Fu-Tsai Kung; Yi-Chi Lin; Hsin-Ju Chiang; Yu-Ju Lin; Kuo-Chung Lan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Determinants of The Grade A Embryos in Infertile Women; Zero-Inflated Regression Model.

Authors:  Amir Almasi-Hashiani; Azadeh Ghaheri; Reza Omani Samani
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Prediction of blastocyst development and implantation potential in utero based on the third cleavage and compaction times in mouse pre-implantation embryos.

Authors:  Jihyun Kim; Seok Hyun Kim; Jin Hyun Jun
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  It is not worth postponing frozen embryo transfers after oocyte pickup: A retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.

Authors:  Mengxia Ji; Bihui Jin; Xiaoyan Guo; Ruifang Wu; Yunqing Jiang; Ling Zhang; Jing Shu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.055

9.  Effects of cumulus cell removal time during in vitro fertilization on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study.

Authors:  Na Guo; Fei Yang; Qun Liu; Xinling Ren; Hua Zhao; Yufeng Li; Jihui Ai
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Prediction of the in vitro developmental competence of early-cleavage-stage human embryos with time-lapse imaging and oxygen consumption rate measurement.

Authors:  Kaori Goto; Yoko Kumasako; Megumi Koike; Akiko Kanda; Kyoko Kido; Miyuki Nagaki; Eiko Otsu; Fumiko Kawabe; Yufuko Kai; Takafumi Utsunomiya
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.