Literature DB >> 19409340

Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile.

Kevin O'Brien1, Tatiana Macfarlane, Jean Wright, Frances Conboy, Priscilla Appelbe, David Birnie, Stephen Chadwick, Ivan Connolly, Mark Hammond, Nigel Harradine, David Lewis, Simon Littlewood, Catherine McDade, Laura Mitchell, Alison Murray, Julian O'Neill, Jonathan Sandler, Micheal Read, Stephen Robinson, Iain Shaw, Elizabeth Turbill.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aims of this study were to assess whether early Twin-block appliance treatment improves the attractiveness of Class II profiles and to determine the orofacial features of a profile that most influence the perception of attractiveness.
METHODS: Silhouetted profiles of 20 treated patients and 20 untreated controls randomly selected from 174 subjects (ages, 8-10 years) of a randomized, controlled trial into the effectiveness of early Class II treatment were assessed by 30 children (ages, 10-11 years) and 24 teaching staff using a 5-point Likert scale. Independent samples t tests were used to compare attractiveness ratings between the treated and untreated groups. Linear regression was used to determine the features defining attractiveness.
RESULTS: Early orthodontic treatment resulted in improved perceptions of facial profile attractiveness. Profiles were likely to be rated as attractive if the overjet was smaller (P = 0.001) and no teeth showed (P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Profile silhouettes of children who had received early orthodontic treatment for Class II malocclusion were perceived to be more attractive by peers than those of children who did not receive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19409340     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the splint-supported Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects.

Authors:  Sherif A Elkordy; Ramy Abdeldayem; Mona M S Fayed; Ibrahim Negm; Dina El Ghoul; Amr M Abouelezz
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Second Class Functional Treatment: Andreasen Activator vs Twin Block.

Authors:  Giulia Baccaglione; Elisa Rota; Maurizio Ferrari; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

3.  Effect of Class II functional treatment on facial attractiveness, as perceived by professionals and laypeople.

Authors:  Federica Santori; Francesco Masedu; Domenico Ciavarella; Edoardo Staderini; Claudio Chimenti; Michele Tepedino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.

Authors:  Stjepan Spalj; Kate Mroz Tranesen; Kari Birkeland; Visnja Katic; Andrej Pavlic; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients.

Authors:  Mary-Eleni Zouloumi; Kleopatra Tsiouli; Simeon Psomiadis; Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.