BACKGROUND: Analysis of change in health status using data from two waves can be examined either adjusted or unadjusted for baseline health status. The effect of socioeconomic position (SEP) on cognitive change was assessed using both these strategies and the implications of the analyses are discussed. METHODS: Data from 1261 men and 483 women of the Whitehall II cohort study, aged 50-55 years at wave 1, were used. Cognition was assessed at both waves using a test of verbal memory, and two tests of verbal fluency. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate the effect of SEP on change score and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to estimate this effect adjusted for the baseline cognitive score. The ANCOVA estimates were corrected for bias due to measurement error (estimated based on 3-month test-retest). Finally, ANCOVA estimates were examined for increasing levels of measurement error. RESULTS: The results of the ANOVA suggest no effect of SEP on cognitive decline. In contrast, the ANCOVA suggests significantly greater cognitive decline in the lower SEP groups. However, the ANCOVA estimates for the effect of wave 1 cognition show evidence for regression to the mean due to the presence of measurement error. The corrected ANCOVA estimates show no association between SEP and cognitive decline. CONCLUSIONS: Results from analysis of change using two waves of observational data, when adjusted for baseline, should be interpreted with caution.
BACKGROUND: Analysis of change in health status using data from two waves can be examined either adjusted or unadjusted for baseline health status. The effect of socioeconomic position (SEP) on cognitive change was assessed using both these strategies and the implications of the analyses are discussed. METHODS: Data from 1261 men and 483 women of the Whitehall II cohort study, aged 50-55 years at wave 1, were used. Cognition was assessed at both waves using a test of verbal memory, and two tests of verbal fluency. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate the effect of SEP on change score and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to estimate this effect adjusted for the baseline cognitive score. The ANCOVA estimates were corrected for bias due to measurement error (estimated based on 3-month test-retest). Finally, ANCOVA estimates were examined for increasing levels of measurement error. RESULTS: The results of the ANOVA suggest no effect of SEP on cognitive decline. In contrast, the ANCOVA suggests significantly greater cognitive decline in the lower SEP groups. However, the ANCOVA estimates for the effect of wave 1 cognition show evidence for regression to the mean due to the presence of measurement error. The corrected ANCOVA estimates show no association between SEP and cognitive decline. CONCLUSIONS: Results from analysis of change using two waves of observational data, when adjusted for baseline, should be interpreted with caution.
Authors: J E Gallacher; P C Elwood; C Hopkinson; P M Rabbitt; B T Stollery; P M Sweetnam; C Brayne; F A Huppert Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Annemarie Koster; Brenda W J H Penninx; Hans Bosma; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Anne B Newman; Susan M Rubin; Suzanne Satterfield; Hal H Atkinson; Hilsa N Ayonayon; Caterina Rosano; Kristine Yaffe; Tamara B Harris; Ronica N Rooks; Jacques Thm Van Eijk; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Laura B Zahodne; M Maria Glymour; Catharine Sparks; Daniel Bontempo; Roger A Dixon; Stuart W S MacDonald; Jennifer J Manly Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Fredric D Wolinsky; Suzanne E Bentler; Jason Hockenberry; Michael P Jones; Paula A Weigel; Brian Kaskie; Robert B Wallace Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Martin Lövdén; Laura Fratiglioni; M Maria Glymour; Ulman Lindenberger; Elliot M Tucker-Drob Journal: Psychol Sci Public Interest Date: 2020-08