| Literature DB >> 15587675 |
Simon Lemay1, Marc-André Bédard, Isabelle Rouleau, Pierre-Luc Gilbert Tremblay.
Abstract
There is a lack of data about the practice effect and test-retest reliability (TRR) on many attentional and executive tests in neuropsychology. In this study, 37 subjects aged 52 to 80 were tested three times with an inter-assessment interval of 14 days. The battery included the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, the Stroop interference test, the Letter-Number Sequencing test, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III), the Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test, the Tower of London, the Verbal Fluency test, and simple, choice, and sequential reaction time tests. The results showed that tasks were generally subject to a practice effect, except for those with alternate forms. In all tests, there were a number of scores demonstrating good TRR, but others, although largely used in clinical practice, failed to reach acceptable TRR standards. Usually, time derived scores were associated with the best TRR.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15587675 DOI: 10.1080/13854040490501718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Neuropsychol ISSN: 1385-4046 Impact factor: 3.535