Literature DB >> 19406065

Cystatin C provides more information than other renal function parameters for stratifying risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

José M García Acuña1, Eva González-Babarro, Lilian Grigorian Shamagian, Carlos Peña-Gil, Rafael Vidal Pérez, Ana M López-Lago, Mario Gutiérrez Feijoó, José R González-Juanatey.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: The protein cystatin C has a stable plasma concentration and is eliminated exclusively by the kidneys. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of cystatin C in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
METHODS: The prospective study included 203 hospitalized ACS patients. Clinical evaluation during the first 24 hours of hospitalization included a hemogram and measurement of creatinine, cystatin C, total and fractionated cholesterol and markers of myocardial necrosis. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) equation. A comparison was made between two groups of patients divided according to a serum cystatin-C level above or below 0.95 mg/L. The mean follow-up period was 151 days.
RESULTS: In total, 90 patients (44.3%) had a cystatin-C level < or =0.95 mg/L and 113 (55.7%) had a level >0.95 mg/L. Those with a cystatin-C level >0.95 mg/L had poorer in-hospital outcomes, including more frequent heart failure (51.3% vs. 13.3%; P=.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (17.6% vs. 3.3%; P=.001), as well as higher mortality throughout follow-up (22.0% vs. 5.6%; P=.001). Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, ejection fraction and troponin-I and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations showed that cystatin C was the most powerful independent predictor of a cardiovascular event (relative risk=1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.53). Patients with a GFR >60 mL/1.73 m(2) and a cystatin-C level >0.95 mg/L had higher in-hospital mortality (10.2% vs. 3.9%; P=.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of cystatin C in high-risk ACS patients may be clinically useful for risk stratification during hospitalization, particularly in those with a normal GFR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19406065     DOI: 10.1016/s1885-5857(09)71833-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8932            Impact factor:   4.753


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Risk Prediction With the CKD-EPI and MDRD Equations in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Pedro J Flores-Blanco; Ángel López-Cuenca; James L Januzzi; Francisco Marín; Marianela Sánchez-Martínez; Miriam Quintana-Giner; Ana I Romero-Aniorte; Mariano Valdés; Sergio Manzano-Fernández
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Laboratory parameters of cardiac and kidney dysfunction in cardio-renal syndromes.

Authors:  Dinna N Cruz; Ching Yan Goh; Alberto Palazzuoli; Leo Slavin; Anna Calabrò; Claudio Ronco; Alan Maisel
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  The impact of admission cystatin C levels on in-hospital and three-year mortality rates in acute decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Hatice Selcuk; Mehmet Timur Selcuk; Orhan Maden; Kevser Gülcihan Balci; Mustafa Mücahit Balci; Sebahat Tekeli; Elif Hande Çetin; Ahmet Temizhan; Mustafa Balci; Nihal Karabiber
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 1.167

Review 4.  Prognostic Biomarkers in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Risk Stratification Beyond Cardiac Troponins.

Authors:  K M Eggers; B Lindahl
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Association Between Increased Levels of Cystatin C and the Development of Cardiovascular Events or Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Fuchs Einwoegerer; Caroline Pereira Domingueti
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.