Literature DB >> 19405825

A prospective multicenter 5-year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients.

David L Cochran1, Pirkka V Nummikoski, John D Schoolfield, Archie A Jones, Thomas W Oates.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dental implants have been used to replace missing teeth to provide function and esthetics. One goal of such restorations is to maintain host tissue around the implants. The purpose of this prospective multicenter human clinical trial was to evaluate radiographic marginal bone levels around non-submerged hollow cylindrical and solid-screw implants for 5 years after loading.
METHODS: Patients older than 18 years of age with sufficient native bone to surround a dental implant without imposing on a vital structure were recruited at five sites. Solid-screw or hollow-cylinder implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed implant surface were placed in the anterior maxilla or anterior mandible and restored with fixed restorations. Baseline radiographs were taken at the time of implant placement. Subsequent radiographs were taken at the time of final prosthesis placement, at 6 months after prosthesis placement, and annually from prosthesis placement for 5 years.
RESULTS: The results of 596 implants in 192 patients at five international sites revealed that clinically significant remodeling of the marginal bone occurred during the first 6 months after implant placement, with a mean (+/- SD) marginal bone loss of 2.44 +/- 1.20 mm. After that, clinically insignificant mean changes in the bone were observed. Overall, 0.22 +/- 0.42 mm of bone loss occurred between the time of prosthesis placement and 1-year postloading. Between 1-year postloading and the last 5-year recall, 0.18 +/- 0.88 mm bone loss occurred. Because 2.84 +/- 1.63 mm of bone loss occurred between implant placement and the 5-year postloading follow-up, 86% of the total mean bone loss over the course of 5 years was accounted for at the time of prosthesis placement. These same trends occurred if the data were analyzed with regard to implant design (solid screw and hollow cylinder), type of restoration (single and multiple), and length of implant (8 to 10, 12, and 14 to 16 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that, in general, clinically significant marginal bone remodeling occurred between the time of implant placement and final prosthesis placement around one-stage non-submerged titanium implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface. Subsequent to that, bone loss observed around implants up to 5 years postloading was minimal. These results suggest that the factors that influence early healing around implants are significantly different from those that affect later marginal bone remodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19405825     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2009.080401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  12 in total

1.  A method for segmentation of dental implants and crestal bone.

Authors:  Pedro Cunha; Miguel A Guevara; Ana Messias; Salomão Rocha; Rita Reis; Pedro M G Nicolau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.

Authors:  K Kamburoğlu; S Murat; C Kılıç; S Yüksel; H Avsever; A Farman; W C Scarfe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Marginal bone response of implants with platform switching and non-platform switching abutments in posterior healed sites: a 1-year prospective study.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Wang; Joseph Y K Kan; Kitichai Rungcharassaeng; Phillip Roe; Jaime L Lozada
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Radiographic evaluation of conical tapered platform-switched implants in the posterior mandible: 1-year results of a two-center prospective study.

Authors:  Maximilian Moergel; Salomão Rocha; Ana Messias; Pedro Nicolau; Fernando Guerra; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 5.977

5.  A New Method of Measuring the Volumetric Change of Alveolar Bone Around Dental Implants Using Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Young-Wook Lim; Young-Jun Lim; Bongju Kim; Seung-Pyo Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  The Long-Term Effect of Smoking on 10 Years' Survival and Success of Dental Implants: A Prospective Analysis of 453 Implants in a Non-University Setting.

Authors:  Simon Windael; Stijn Vervaeke; Stefanie De Buyser; Hugo De Bruyn; Bruno Collaert
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Clinical Performance of Implant Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures for Mandibular Edentulism-A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Yoo; Seong-Kyun Kim; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak; Hye-Rin Jeon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Effect of loading time on marginal bone loss around hydroxyapatite-coated implants.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Kyo-Jin Ahn; Pil-Young Yun; Minkyoung Kim; Hong-So Yang; Yang-Jin Yi; Ji-Hyun Bae
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-08-23

9.  Effect of platform switching on crestal bone levels around implants in the posterior mandible: 3 years results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Salomão Rocha; Wilfried Wagner; Jörg Wiltfang; Pedro Nicolau; Maximilian Moergel; Ana Messias; Eleonore Behrens; Fernando Guerra
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 8.728

10.  One-Piece Implants with Smooth Concave Neck to Enhance Soft Tissue Development and Preserve Marginal Bone Levels: A Retrospective Study with 1- to 6-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Axiotis; Paolo Nuzzolo; Carlo Barausse; Roberta Gasparro; Paolo Bucci; Roberto Pistilli; Gilberto Sammartino; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.