Literature DB >> 19405151

Physiological responses of CHO cells to repetitive hydrodynamic stress.

Ruben Godoy-Silva1, Jeffrey J Chalmers, Susan A Casnocha, Laura A Bass, Ningning Ma.   

Abstract

A majority of the previous investigations on the hydrodynamic sensitivity of mammalian cells have focused on lethal effects as determined by cell death or lysis. In this study, we investigated the effect of hydrodynamic stress on CHO cells in a fed-batch process using a previously reported system which subjects cells to repetitive, high levels of hydrodynamic stress, quantified by energy dissipation rate (EDR). The results indicated that cell growth and monoclonal antibody production of the test cells were very resistant to the hydrodynamic stress. Compared to the control, no significant variation was observed at the highest EDR tested, 6.4 x 10(6) W/m(3). Most product quality attributes were not affected by intense hydrodynamic stress either. The only significant impact was on glycosylation. A shift of glycosylation pattern was observed at EDR levels at or higher than 6.0 x 10(4) W/m(3), which is two orders of magnitude lower than the EDR where physical cell damage, as measured by lactate dehydrogenase release, was observed. While not as extensively investigated, a second monoclonal antibody produced in a different CHO clone exhibited the same glycosylation change at an intensive EDR, 2.9 x 10(5) W/m(3). Conversely, a low EDR of 0.9 x 10(2) W/m(3) had no effect on the glycosylation pattern. As 6.0 x 10(4) W/m(3), the lowest EDR that triggers the glycosylation shift, is about one order of magnitude higher than the estimated, maximum EDR in typically operated, large-scale stirred tank bioreactors, further studies in a lower EDR range of 1 x 10(3)-6.0 x 10(4) W/m(3) are needed to assess the glycosylation shift effect under typical large-scale bioreactor operation conditions. Follow-up studies in stirred tanks are also needed to confirm the glycosylation shift effect and to validate the repetitive hydrodynamic stress model. Copyright 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19405151     DOI: 10.1002/bit.22339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  8 in total

1.  Equipment characterization to mitigate risks during transfers of cell culture manufacturing processes.

Authors:  Christian Sieblist; Marco Jenzsch; Michael Pohlscheidt
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  The potential of hydrodynamic damage to animal cells of industrial relevance: current understanding.

Authors:  Weiwei Hu; Claudia Berdugo; Jeffrey J Chalmers
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Glycobiotechnology of the Insect Cell-Baculovirus Expression System Technology.

Authors:  Laura A Palomares; Indresh K Srivastava; Octavio T Ramírez; Manon M J Cox
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.635

4.  A comprehensive comparison of mixing and mass transfer in shake flasks and their relationship with MAb productivity of CHO cells.

Authors:  Saumel Pérez-Rodriguez; Greta I Reynoso-Cereceda; Norma A Valdez-Cruz; Mauricio A Trujillo-Roldán
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Albumin and mammalian cell culture: implications for biotechnology applications.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Francis
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.058

6.  On the fluid dynamics of a laboratory scale single-use stirred bioreactor.

Authors:  A O O Odeleye; D T J Marsh; M D Osborne; G J Lye; M Micheletti
Journal:  Chem Eng Sci       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.311

7.  Differential response in downstream processing of CHO cells grown under mild hypothermic conditions.

Authors:  Andrew S Tait; Richard D R Tarrant; M Lourdes Velez-Suberbie; Daniel I R Spencer; Daniel G Bracewell
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2013-05-02

8.  Quantifying the potential for bursting bubbles to damage suspended cells.

Authors:  Peter L L Walls; Oliver McRae; Venkatesh Natarajan; Chris Johnson; Chris Antoniou; James C Bird
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.