Jamie R Litvack1, Jess C Mace, Timothy L Smith. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olfactory dysfunction is deemed to be a significant contributor to poor quality of life (QOL). However, little is known about the relationship of olfactory testing to other measures of disease burden in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this study, we examine the relationship of olfactory function to computed tomography (CT) scores, endoscopy scores, and QOL measures in patients with CRS. METHODS: A multi-institutional, cross-sectional analysis of 367 patients was performed. Several objective measures were collected: the Smell Identification Test, Lund-MacKay CT score, Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score, two validated disease-specific QOL instruments, the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index and the Chronic Sinusitis Survey, and a general health-related QOL instrument, the Medical Short Form-36. Analysis of variance was performed. Correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: Patients with olfactory dysfunction had significantly worse mean endoscopy scores (normosmics, 4.16 [+/- 3.97]; hyposmics, 6.26 [+/- 4.21]; anosmics, 9.61 [+/- 4.48]; p < 0.001) and significantly worse CT scores (normosmics, 9.11 [+/- 5.40]; hyposmics, 11.16 [+/- 5.96]; anosmics, 17.62 [+/- 5.37]; p < 0.001). Endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with olfactory scores (r = -0.46; 95% CI, -0.38, -0.54; p < 0.001). CT scores were moderately correlated with olfactory scores (r = -0.53; 95% CI, -0.45, -0.60; p < 0.001). Olfactory function was not correlated with disease-specific or general health-related QOL measures. CONCLUSION: Although previous studies have suggested that olfactory impairment is associated with poor QOL, this study found no such correlation. In contrast, olfaction scores correlated well with other objective measures of CRS, namely, endoscopy and CT scores.
BACKGROUND:Olfactory dysfunction is deemed to be a significant contributor to poor quality of life (QOL). However, little is known about the relationship of olfactory testing to other measures of disease burden in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this study, we examine the relationship of olfactory function to computed tomography (CT) scores, endoscopy scores, and QOL measures in patients with CRS. METHODS: A multi-institutional, cross-sectional analysis of 367 patients was performed. Several objective measures were collected: the Smell Identification Test, Lund-MacKay CT score, Lund-Kennedy endoscopy score, two validated disease-specific QOL instruments, the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index and the Chronic Sinusitis Survey, and a general health-related QOL instrument, the Medical Short Form-36. Analysis of variance was performed. Correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS:Patients with olfactory dysfunction had significantly worse mean endoscopy scores (normosmics, 4.16 [+/- 3.97]; hyposmics, 6.26 [+/- 4.21]; anosmics, 9.61 [+/- 4.48]; p < 0.001) and significantly worse CT scores (normosmics, 9.11 [+/- 5.40]; hyposmics, 11.16 [+/- 5.96]; anosmics, 17.62 [+/- 5.37]; p < 0.001). Endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with olfactory scores (r = -0.46; 95% CI, -0.38, -0.54; p < 0.001). CT scores were moderately correlated with olfactory scores (r = -0.53; 95% CI, -0.45, -0.60; p < 0.001). Olfactory function was not correlated with disease-specific or general health-related QOL measures. CONCLUSION: Although previous studies have suggested that olfactory impairment is associated with poor QOL, this study found no such correlation. In contrast, olfaction scores correlated well with other objective measures of CRS, namely, endoscopy and CT scores.
Authors: Michael S Benninger; Berrylin J Ferguson; James A Hadley; Daniel L Hamilos; Michael Jacobs; David W Kennedy; Donald C Lanza; Bradley F Marple; J David Osguthorpe; James A Stankiewicz; Jack Anon; James Denneny; Ivor Emanuel; Howard Levine Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Andreas F P Temmel; Christian Quint; Bettina Schickinger-Fischer; Ludger Klimek; Elisabeth Stoller; Thomas Hummel Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2002-06
Authors: D A Deems; R L Doty; R G Settle; V Moore-Gillon; P Shaman; A F Mester; C P Kimmelman; V J Brightman; J B Snow Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 1991-05
Authors: Peter H Hwang; Sande B Irwin; Susan E Griest; James E Caro; Gary M Nesbit Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.591
Authors: Karen K Yee; Edmund A Pribitkin; Beverly J Cowart; Aldona A Vainius; Christopher T Klock; David Rosen; Pu Feng; Judith McLean; Chang-Gyu Hahn; Nancy E Rawson Journal: Am J Rhinol Allergy Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.467
Authors: Andrew J Thomas; Jess C Mace; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Jeremiah A Alt; Jose L Mattos; Rodney J Schlosser; Zachary M Soler; Timothy L Smith Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 3.858