Literature DB >> 19397304

Peptide storage: are you getting the best return on your investment? Defining optimal storage conditions for proteomics samples.

Alexandra Kraut1, Marlène Marcellin, Annie Adrait, Lauriane Kuhn, Mathilde Louwagie, Sylvie Kieffer-Jaquinod, Dorothée Lebert, Christophe D Masselon, Alain Dupuis, Christophe Bruley, Michel Jaquinod, Jérôme Garin, Maighread Gallagher-Gambarelli.   

Abstract

To comply with current proteomics guidelines, it is often necessary to analyze the same peptide samples several times. Between analyses, the sample must be stored in such a way as to conserve its intrinsic properties, without losing either peptides or signal intensity. This article describes two studies designed to define the optimal storage conditions for peptide samples between analyses. With the use of a label-free strategy, peptide conservation was compared over a 28-day period in three different recipients: standard plastic tubes, glass tubes, and low-adsorption plastic tubes. The results of this study showed that standard plastic tubes are unsuitable for peptide storage over the period studied. Glass tubes were found to perform better than standard plastic, but optimal peptide recovery was achieved using low-adsorption plastic tubes. The peptides showing poor recovery following storage were mainly hydrophobic in nature. The differences in peptide recovery between glass and low-adsorption plastic tubes were further studied using isotopically labeled proteins. This study allowed accurate comparison of peptide recovery between the two tube types within the same LC-MS run. The results of the label-free study were confirmed. Further, it was possible to demonstrate that peptide recovery in low-adsorption plastic tubes was optimal whatever the peptide concentration stored.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19397304     DOI: 10.1021/pr900095u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  14 in total

1.  Protein transfer into human cells by VSV-G-induced nanovesicles.

Authors:  Philippe-Emmanuel Mangeot; Sandra Dollet; Mathilde Girard; Claire Ciancia; Stéphane Joly; Marc Peschanski; Vincent Lotteau
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Direct quantitation of methyl phosphonate adducts to human serum butyrylcholinesterase by immunomagnetic-UHPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Melissa D Carter; Brian S Crow; Brooke G Pantazides; Caroline M Watson; Jerry D Thomas; Thomas A Blake; Rudolph C Johnson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Stable-isotope dilution LC–MS for quantitative biomarker analysis.

Authors:  Eugene Ciccimaro; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Nutriproteomics and Proteogenomics: Cultivating Two Novel Hybrid Fields of Personalized Medicine with Added Societal Value.

Authors:  Vural Ozdemir; Jean Armengaud; Laurette Dubé; Ramy Karam Aziz; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Curr Pharmacogenomics Person Med       Date:  2010-12-01

5.  Quantitation of ortho-cresyl phosphate adducts to butyrylcholinesterase in human serum by immunomagnetic-UHPLC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Darryl Johnson; Melissa D Carter; Brian S Crow; Samantha L Isenberg; Leigh Ann Graham; H Akin Erol; Caroline M Watson; Brooke G Pantazides; Marcel J van der Schans; Jan P Langenberg; Daan Noort; Thomas A Blake; Jerry D Thomas; Rudolph C Johnson
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.982

6.  Recommendations for the Generation, Quantification, Storage, and Handling of Peptides Used for Mass Spectrometry-Based Assays.

Authors:  Andrew N Hoofnagle; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Steven A Carr; Eric Kuhn; Tao Liu; Sam A Massoni; Stefani N Thomas; R Reid Townsend; Lisa J Zimmerman; Emily Boja; Jing Chen; Daniel L Crimmins; Sherri R Davies; Yuqian Gao; Tara R Hiltke; Karen A Ketchum; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Matthew R Meyer; Wei-Jun Qian; Regine M Schoenherr; Mitchell G Scott; Tujin Shi; Gordon R Whiteley; John A Wrobel; Chaochao Wu; Brad L Ackermann; Ruedi Aebersold; David R Barnidge; David M Bunk; Nigel Clarke; Jordan B Fishman; Russ P Grant; Ulrike Kusebauch; Mark M Kushnir; Mark S Lowenthal; Robert L Moritz; Hendrik Neubert; Scott D Patterson; Alan L Rockwood; John Rogers; Ravinder J Singh; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Steven H Wong; Shucha Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Xian Chen; Matthew J Ellis; Daniel C Liebler; Karin D Rodland; Henry Rodriguez; Richard D Smith; Zhen Zhang; Hui Zhang; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  Insight Into the Molecular Mechanisms Underpinning the Mycoremediation of Multiple Metals by Proteomic Technique.

Authors:  Priyadarshini Dey; Anushree Malik; Dileep Kumar Singh; Sven-Bastiaan Haange; Martin von Bergen; Nico Jehmlich
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.064

8.  Proteomic Signature Reveals Modulation of Human Macrophage Polarization and Functions Under Differing Environmental Oxygen Conditions.

Authors:  Magali Court; Graciane Petre; Michèle El Atifi; Arnaud Millet
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Three different classes of aminotransferases evolved prephenate aminotransferase functionality in arogenate-competent microorganisms.

Authors:  Matthieu Graindorge; Cécile Giustini; Alexandra Kraut; Lucas Moyet; Gilles Curien; Michel Matringe
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  The effect of peptide adsorption on signal linearity and a simple approach to improve reliability of quantification.

Authors:  Stacey Warwood; Adam Byron; Martin J Humphries; David Knight
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.