Literature DB >> 19397099

Comparative study on the use of analytical software to identify the different stages of breast cancer using discrete temperature data.

Joanna M Y Tan1, E Y K Ng, Rajendra U Acharya, Louis G Keith, Jim Holmes.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death in women. It occurs when cells in the breast begin to grow out of control and invade nearby tissues or spread throughout the body. The limitations of mammography as a screening modality, especially in young women with denser breasts, necessitated the development of novel and more effective screening strategies with acceptable sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this study was to develop a feasible interpretive software system which was able to detect and classify breast cancer patients by employing techniques of different analytical software. The protocol described uses 6,000 pieces of thermal data collected from 16-sensors, eight placed on the surface of each breast. Data was collected every 5 min for the duration of the test period. Placement of sensors was accomplished with the use of a template design from information provided by the national tumor registry to insure that the information was collected in areas of the breast where most breast cancers develop. Data in this study was collected from 90 individuals exhibiting four different breast conditions, namely: normal, benign, cancer and suspected-cancer. The temperature data collected from these 16 sensors placed on the surface of each breast were fed as inputs to the classifiers. Comparisons were made on five different kinds of classifiers: back-propagation algorithm, probabilistic neural network, fuzzy (Sugeno-type), Gaussian mixture modeland support vector machine. These classifiers were able to attain approximately 80% accuracy in classifying the four different diagnoses (normal, benign, cancer and suspected-cancer). Gaussian mixture model was the most sensitive classifier, achieving the highest sensitivity of 94.8%. Support vector machine was considered the best classifier as it was able to produce the most specific and accurate results. Based on these evaluations, this current effort shows the feasibility of applying analytical software techniques together with the real-time functional thermal analysis to develop a potential tool for the detection and classification of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19397099     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9174-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  16 in total

Review 1.  Screening and diagnostic mammograms: why the gold standard does not shine more brightly.

Authors:  Arjun Sobti; Pamela Sobti; Louis G Keith
Journal:  Int J Fertil Womens Med       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

2.  An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms.

Authors:  K R Müller; S Mika; G Rätsch; K Tsuda; B Schölkopf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2001

3.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Paul Weatherall; David Thickman; Nola Hylton; Ellen Warner; Etta Pisano; Stuart J Schnitt; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell Schnall; Gia A DeAngelis; Paul Stomper; Eric L Rosen; Michael O'Loughlin; Steven Harms; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Heather Wright; Jay Listinsky; Alice Rim; Melanie Chellman-Jeffers; Rebecca Patrick; Lisa Rybicki; Julian Kim; Joseph Crowe
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Age at first birth and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  B MacMahon; P Cole; T M Lin; C R Lowe; A P Mirra; B Ravnihar; E J Salber; V G Valaoras; S Yuasa
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Donald B Plewes; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Judit T Zubovits; Roberta A Jong; Margaret R Cutrara; Gerrit DeBoer; Martin J Yaffe; Sandra J Messner; Wendy S Meschino; Cameron A Piron; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Computerized detection of breast cancer with artificial intelligence and thermograms.

Authors:  E Y-K Ng; S C Fok; Y C Peh; F C Ng; L S J Sim
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

10.  The potential role of dynamic thermal analysis in breast cancer detection.

Authors:  M Salhab; L G Keith; M Laguens; W Reeves; K Mokbel
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-04-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Automated detection of breast cancer in thermal infrared images, based on independent component analysis.

Authors:  Luciano Boquete; Sergio Ortega; Juan Manuel Miguel-Jiménez; José Manuel Rodríguez-Ascariz; Román Blanco
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Thermography based breast cancer detection using texture features and Support Vector Machine.

Authors:  U Rajendra Acharya; E Y K Ng; Jen-Hong Tan; S Vinitha Sree
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Cannabinoids as therapeutic agents in cancer: current status and future implications.

Authors:  Bandana Chakravarti; Janani Ravi; Ramesh K Ganju
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-08-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.