OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of propiverine hydrochloride (antimuscarinic), naftopidil (alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist) or both in patients with male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia and concomitant overactive bladder (OAB). MATERIAL AND METHODS:Men aged at least 50 years who had a total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 8 or higher and bladder dairy documenting micturition frequency (more than eight micturitions/24 h) and urgency (more than one episode/24 h), with or without urgency urinary incontinence were randomized into three groups: group N, naftopidil (50 mg once daily) only; group P, propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once daily); and group NP, naftopidil (50 mg once daily) plus propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once daily) for a 4-week treatment regimen. RESULTS:A total of 66 men, including 20 in group N, 23 in group P and 23 in group NP, were treated and 58 (87.9%) completed the 4 weeks of treatment. IPSS improved significantly in groups N and NP. Urinary frequency improved significantly in groups P and NP. Postvoid residual urine volume increased significantly in groups P and NP. Significant improvements in urgency episodes were noted in each group. One patient in group P required catheterization owing to acute urinary retention and another stopped medication because of difficulty in voiding. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that each treatment showed effectiveness for male LUTS with OAB. However, there are some possibilities of adverse effects with propiverine hydrochloride monotherapy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of propiverine hydrochloride (antimuscarinic), naftopidil (alpha(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist) or both in patients with male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia and concomitant overactive bladder (OAB). MATERIAL AND METHODS:Men aged at least 50 years who had a total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of 8 or higher and bladder dairy documenting micturition frequency (more than eight micturitions/24 h) and urgency (more than one episode/24 h), with or without urgency urinary incontinence were randomized into three groups: group N, naftopidil (50 mg once daily) only; group P, propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once daily); and group NP, naftopidil (50 mg once daily) plus propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once daily) for a 4-week treatment regimen. RESULTS: A total of 66 men, including 20 in group N, 23 in group P and 23 in group NP, were treated and 58 (87.9%) completed the 4 weeks of treatment. IPSS improved significantly in groups N and NP. Urinary frequency improved significantly in groups P and NP. Postvoid residual urine volume increased significantly in groups P and NP. Significant improvements in urgency episodes were noted in each group. One patient in group P required catheterization owing to acute urinary retention and another stopped medication because of difficulty in voiding. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that each treatment showed effectiveness for male LUTS with OAB. However, there are some possibilities of adverse effects with propiverine hydrochloride monotherapy.
Authors: Melinda Wuest; Lambertus P Witte; Martina B Michel-Reher; Stefan Propping; Manfred Braeter; Gerhard J Strugala; Manfred P Wirth; Martin C Michel; Ursula Ravens Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Eu Chang Hwang; Shreyas Gandhi; Jae Hung Jung; Mari Imamura; Myung Ha Kim; Ran Pang; Philipp Dahm Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-11