Literature DB >> 19396579

Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and bur.

Yonca Korkmaz1, Emre Ozel, Nuray Attar, Ceren Ozge Bicer, Erhan Firatli.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites in class V cavities prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser and bur. Class V cavities were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 72 premolars by Er:YAG laser or bur and divided into six groups (n = 24). The occlusal margins were enamel and the cervical margins were cementum. The groups were as follows: group 1 Er:YAG laser preparation (E) + Xeno V (X) + CeramX (C); group 2 bur preparation (B) + X + C; group 3 E + AdheSE One (A) + Tetric EvoCeram (T); group 4 B + A + T; group 5 E + Clearfil S3 Bond (CSB) + Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (CME); group 6 B + CSB + CME. All teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, then thermocycled 500 times (5-55 degrees C). Ten teeth from each group were chosen for the microleakage investigation and two teeth for the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation. The teeth that were prepared for the microleakage test were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. After immersion, the teeth were sectioned and observed under a stereomicroscope for dye penetration. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (P < 0.05). Bur-prepared cavities presented less microleakage in all groups for enamel (P < 0.05); however, in cervical margins, there were no differences between laser-prepared and bur-prepared cavities in the Xeno V + CeramX and AdheSE One + Tetric EvoCeram groups (P > 0.05). SEM observations of restorative material-dentin interfaces seemed to correspond with those of the microleakage test. Microleakage at the cervical interfaces was greater than that at the occlusal interfaces. Er:YAG laser-prepared class V cavities yielded more microleakage in occlusal margins with all-in-one self-etch adhesives and the respective manufacturer's nanocomposites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396579     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-009-0672-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  48 in total

1.  Bonding to Er-YAG-laser-treated dentin.

Authors:  L Ceballo; M Toledano; R Osorio; F R Tay; G W Marshall
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Self-etching bonding agents.

Authors:  Karl F Leinfelder; Steven M Kurdziolek
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2003-06

3.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Bart Van Meerbeek; Jan De Munck; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Satoshi Inoue; Marcos Vargas; Padmini Vijay; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Paul Lambrechts; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

4.  In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass ionomer.

Authors:  S K Sidhu; L J Henderson
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

5.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel.

Authors:  D H Pashley; F R Tay
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Influence of acid etching and enamel beveling on the 6-month clinical performance of a self-etch dentin adhesive.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão; Camillo Anauate-Netto; André R P Carmo; Hugo R Lewgoy; Hiram João D Cordeiro; Maristela Dutra-Corrêa; Natália Castilhos; Ricardo Amore
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2004-01

7.  Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations.

Authors:  Yonca Korkmaz; Emre Ozel; Nuray Attar
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Microleakage of sealants after conventional, bur, and air-abrasion preparation of pits and fissures.

Authors:  S Hatibovic-Kofman; G Z Wright; I Braverman
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.874

9.  The safety and efficacy of treatment with air abrasion technology.

Authors:  G Z Wright; S Hatibovic-Kofman; D W Millenaar; I Braverman
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Microleakage of Class V composite restorations prepared conventionally with those prepared with an Er:YAG laser: a pilot study.

Authors:  G Z Wright; R J McConnell; U Keller
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.874

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin.

Authors:  Özden Özel Bektas; Digdem Eren; Seyda Herguner Siso; Gulsah E Akin
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Effect of Er:YAG laser application on the shear bond strength and microleakage between resin cements and Y-TZP ceramics.

Authors:  Hakan Akin; Faik Tugut; Gulsah Emine Akin; Umit Guney; Burcu Mutaf
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.

Authors:  Ali Baghalian; Yahya B Nakhjavani; Tabassom Hooshmand; Pouria Motahhary; Hoda Bahramian
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Effect of Surface Treatment With Er:YAG and CO2 Lasers on Shear Bond Strength of Polyether Ether Ketone to Composite Resin Veneers.

Authors:  Yousef Jahandideh; Mehran Falahchai; Hossein Pourkhalili
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-15

5.  Strength of the bond between a silicone lining material and denture resin after Er:YAG laser treatments with different pulse durations and levels of energy.

Authors:  Faik Tugut; Hakan Akin; Burcu Mutaf; Gulsah Emine Akin; Ali Kemal Ozdemir
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Effect of the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser or diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different adhesives and composite systems.

Authors:  Batu Can Yaman; Begum Efes Guray; Can Dorter; Yavuz Gomeç; Oktay Yazıcıoglu; Dina Erdilek
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Evaluation of Microleakage in Resin Composites Bonded to an Er:YAG Laser and Bur-Prepared Root and Coronal Dentin Using Different Bonding Agents.

Authors:  Farzaneh Shirani; Reza Birang; Elmira Ahmadpour; Zeynab Heidari; Rouzbeh Ostadsharif Memar; Zahra Zarei; Reza Fekrazad
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-01

8.  Microleakage of repaired class V silorane and nano-hybrid composite restorations after preparation with erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and diamond bur.

Authors:  Batu Can Yaman; Begüm Güray Efes; Can Dörter; Yavuz Gömeç; Dina Erdilek; Oktay Yazıcıoğlu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 9.  Effect of different types of adhesive systems on the bond strength and marginal integrity of composite restorations in cavities prepared with the erbium laser-a systematic review.

Authors:  Deepti Dua; Ankur Dua; Eugenia Anagnostaki; Riccardo Poli; Steven Parker
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 3.161

10.  Assessment of Tooth Preparation via Er:YAG Laser and Bur on Microleakage of Dentin Adhesives.

Authors:  Zahra Bahrololoomi; Elham Heydari
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.