OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the correlation of radiological findings obtained by MRI study with pathological diagnosis in invasive bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients, who underwent total or partial cystectomy for invasive bladder tumors, were enrolled into the present study. Eight cases had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy following the staging biopsy (group A), ten cases had received chemo-radiation therapy following the staging biopsy (group B), and nine cases had received preoperative staging biopsy alone (group C). As a final treatment, 12 of the 27 patients underwent total cystectomy and the other 15 patients underwent partial cystectomy. MRI was conducted prior to total or partial cystectomy in each case. The pathological stage was assessed by histological examination of the entire layer of the bladder wall. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Tumor stage assessed by MRI was consistent with pathological findings in 16 of the 27 cases (59.3%), while MRI produced over-staging in 7 cases and under-staging in 4 cases. The accuracy of staging was 75.0, 30.0, and 77.8% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The accuracy of MRI staging in group B was lower than that in group C (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the accuracy of MRI staging between groups A and C. CONCLUSION: MRI is useful for the staging of bladder cancer. However, care needs to be taken when staging invasive bladder tumors treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy, because inflammatory infiltrations and/or fibrous changes caused by the chemotherapy or chemo-radiation therapy make precise staging with MRI difficult.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the correlation of radiological findings obtained by MRI study with pathological diagnosis in invasive bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without radiation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-seven patients, who underwent total or partial cystectomy for invasive bladder tumors, were enrolled into the present study. Eight cases had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy following the staging biopsy (group A), ten cases had received chemo-radiation therapy following the staging biopsy (group B), and nine cases had received preoperative staging biopsy alone (group C). As a final treatment, 12 of the 27 patients underwent total cystectomy and the other 15 patients underwent partial cystectomy. MRI was conducted prior to total or partial cystectomy in each case. The pathological stage was assessed by histological examination of the entire layer of the bladder wall. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Tumor stage assessed by MRI was consistent with pathological findings in 16 of the 27 cases (59.3%), while MRI produced over-staging in 7 cases and under-staging in 4 cases. The accuracy of staging was 75.0, 30.0, and 77.8% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The accuracy of MRI staging in group B was lower than that in group C (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the accuracy of MRI staging between groups A and C. CONCLUSION: MRI is useful for the staging of bladder cancer. However, care needs to be taken when staging invasive bladder tumors treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiation therapy, because inflammatory infiltrations and/or fibrous changes caused by the chemotherapy or chemo-radiation therapy make precise staging with MRI difficult.
Authors: M Tachibana; S Baba; N Deguchi; S Jitsukawa; M Hata; H Tazaki; A Tanimoto; Y Yuasa; K Hiramatsu Journal: J Urol Date: 1991-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Y Narumi; T Kadota; E Inoue; K Kuriyama; T Horinouchi; K Kasai; H Maeda; M Kuroda; T Kotake; S Ishiguro Journal: Radiology Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H Barton Grossman; Ronald B Natale; Catherine M Tangen; V O Speights; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Donald L Trump; Ralph W deVere White; Michael F Sarosdy; David P Wood; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Y Narumi; T Kadota; E Inoue; K Kuriyama; M Fujita; N Hosomi; Y Sawai; M Kuroda; T Kotake; C Kuroda Journal: Radiology Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Huyen T Nguyen; Kamal S Pohar; Guang Jia; Zarine K Shah; Amir Mortazavi; Debra L Zynger; Lai Wei; Daniel Clark; Xiangyu Yang; Michael V Knopp Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Huyen T Nguyen; Zarine K Shah; Amir Mortazavi; Kamal S Pohar; Lai Wei; Guang Jia; Debra L Zynger; Michael V Knopp Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: E E Fransen van de Putte; E Vegt; L S Mertens; A Bruining; K Hendricksen; M S van der Heijden; S Horenblas; B W G van Rhijn Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2017-07-03 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: K M Patel; K E van der Vos; C G Smith; F Mouliere; D Tsui; J Morris; D Chandrananda; F Marass; D van den Broek; D E Neal; V J Gnanapragasam; T Forshew; B W van Rhijn; C E Massie; N Rosenfeld; M S van der Heijden Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yubing Tong; Jayaram K Udupa; Chuang Wang; Jerry Chen; Sriram Venigalla; Thomas J Guzzo; Ronac Mamtani; Brian C Baumann; John P Christodouleas; Drew A Torigian Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-05-08