| Literature DB >> 30202802 |
Yubing Tong1, Jayaram K Udupa1, Chuang Wang1, Jerry Chen2, Sriram Venigalla2, Thomas J Guzzo3, Ronac Mamtani4, Brian C Baumann5, John P Christodouleas2, Drew A Torigian1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current clinical staging methods are unable to accurately define the extent of invasion of localized bladder cancer, which affects the proper use of systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation. Our purpose was to test a novel radiomics approach to identify optimal imaging biomarkers from T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that accurately classify localized bladder cancer into 2 tumor stage groups (≤T2 vs >T2) at both the patient level and within bladder subsectors. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Preoperative T2-weighted MRI scans of 65 consecutive patients followed by radical cystectomy were identified. A 3-layer, shell-like volume of interest (VOI) was defined on each MRI slice: Inner (lumen), middle (bladder wall), and outer (perivesical tissue). An optimal biomarker method was used to identify features from 15,834 intensity and texture properties that maximized the classification of patients into ≤T2 versus >T2 groups. A leave-one-out strategy was used to cross-validate the performance of the identified biomarker feature set at the patient level. The performance of the feature set was then evaluated at the subsector level of the bladder by dividing the VOIs into 8 radial sectors.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30202802 PMCID: PMC6128093 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.04.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol ISSN: 2452-1094
Figure 1(a) The Visual appearance of bladder wall (arrows) on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan. (b) Schematic diagram of 3-layer, shell-like structure including boundaries and 8 radial sectors.
Figure 2Three-layer, shell-like structure and 8 radial sectors placed about the bladder on serial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan in representative patient.
Figure 3Heat map of feature correlation matrix.
Classification performance for bladder cancer T-staging on the basis of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scan at sector and patient levels
| Sector level | Patient level | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of features | SEN | SPE | ACC | AUC | SEN | SPE | ACC | AUC |
| 9 | 0.681 | 0.788 | 0.763 | 0.813 | 0.742 | 0.824 | 0.785 | 0.806 |
| 14 | 0.790 | 0.748 | 0.758 | 0.816 | 0.742 | 0.765 | 0.754 | 0.798 |
| 18 | 0.782 | 0.728 | 0.740 | 0.818 | 0.806 | 0.735 | 0.769 | 0.793 |
ACC, accuracy of prediction; AUC, area under receiver operating characteristic curve; SEN, sensivitity; SPE, specificity.
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic curves to classify bladder cancer at sector level (left) and patient level (right).
Optimal biomarker set with 9 selected features extracted from middle shell and constituting texture properties
| Kurtosis from uniform LBP with radius 3 and neighborhood 12 | |
| Median from contrast GLCM with window size 3x3 at 360° angle, bins 5, and radius 3 | |
| Median from contrast GLCM with window size 5x5 at 360° angle, bins 5, and radius 3 | |
| High quartile from correlation GLCM with window size 7x7 at 270° angle, bins 5, and radius 2 | |
| High quartile from contrast GLCM with window size 3x3 at 45° angle, bins 5, and radius 3 | |
| High quartile from contrast GLCM with window size 5x5 at 45° angle, bins 5, and radius 3 | |
| High quartile from correlation GLCM with window size 7x7 at 270° angle, bins 5, and radius 3 | |
| High quartile from contrast GLCM with window size 5x5 at 45° angle, bins 10, and radius 3 |
GLCM, grey level cooccurrence matrix; LBP, local binary pattern.