Literature DB >> 19396507

Effect of manual in-line stabilization of the cervical spine in adults on the rate of difficult orotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

François Thiboutot1, Pierre C Nicole, Claude A Trépanier, Alexis F Turgeon, Martin R Lessard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although manual in-line stabilization (MILS) is commonly used during endotracheal intubation in patients with either known or suspected cervical spine instability, the effect of MILS on orotracheal intubation is poorly documented. This study evaluated the rate of failed tracheal intubation in a fixed time interval with MILS.
METHODS: Two hundred elective surgical patients were randomized into two groups. In the MILS group, the patient's head was stabilized in a neutral position by grasping the patient's mastoid processes to minimize any head movement during tracheal intubation. In the control group, the patient's head rested in an optimal position for tracheal intubation. A 30-sec period was allowed to complete tracheal intubation with a #3 Macintosh laryngoscope blade. The primary endpoint was the rate of failed tracheal intubation at 30 sec. Secondary endpoints included tracheal intubation time and the Cormack & Lehane grade of laryngoscopy.
RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar with respect to demographic data and risk factors for difficult tracheal intubation. The rate of failed tracheal intubation at 30 sec was 50% (47/94) in the MILS group compared to 5.7% (6/105) in the control group (P < 0.0001). Laryngoscopic grades 3 and 4 were more frequently observed in the MILS group. Mean times for successful tracheal intubation were 15.8 +/- 8.5 sec and 8.7 +/- 4.6 sec for the MILS and control groups, respectively (mean difference 7.1, CI(95%) 5.0-9.3, P < 0.0001). All patients who failed tracheal intubation in the MILS group were successfully intubated when MILS was removed.
CONCLUSION: In patients with otherwise normal airways, MILS increases the tracheal intubation failure rate at 30 sec and worsens laryngeal visualization during direct laryngoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396507     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-009-9089-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  16 in total

Review 1.  Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Terje Sundstrøm; Helge Asbjørnsen; Samer Habiba; Geir Arne Sunde; Knut Wester
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients.

Authors:  Maria Michailidou; Terence O'Keeffe; Jarrod M Mosier; Randall S Friese; Bellal Joseph; Peter Rhee; John C Sakles
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Clinical evaluation of C-MAC videolaryngoscope with or without use of stylet for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Girija Prasad Rath; Hemanshu Prabhakar
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Endotracheal intubation with intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), C-Trach, and Cobra PLA in simulated cervical spine injury patients: a comparative study.

Authors:  Deepak G Mathew; Rashmi Ramachandran; Vimi Rewari; Anjan Trikha
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  A retrospective descriptive analysis of non-physician-performed prehospital endotracheal intubation practices and performance in South Africa.

Authors:  Craig A Wylie; Farzana Araie; Clint Hendrikse; Jan Burke; Ivan Joubert; Anneli Hardy; Willem Stassen
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-16

6.  Anesthetic considerations in acute spinal cord trauma.

Authors:  Neil Dooney; Armagan Dagal
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2011-01

7.  Success Rate on Endotracheal Intubation with Prone versus Kneeling Position in Mannequin Model with Limitation of Neck Movement: A Cross Over Study.

Authors:  Panvilai Tangkulpanich; Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong; Jirayoot Patchkrua; Chappawit Silarak; Nattagit Srinaowech; Natthaphong Thiamdao; Chaiyaporn Yuksen
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2022-04-19

8.  A comparative study between Truview(PCD) laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in viewing glottic opening and ease of intubation: A crossover study.

Authors:  Sourav Kr Bag; V R Hemanth Kumar; N Krishnaveni; M Ravishankar; J Velraj; M Aruloli
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

Review 9.  Alternative intubation techniques vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in patients with cervical spine immobilization: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  L Suppan; M R Tramèr; M Niquille; O Grosgurin; C Marti
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Effect of rigid cervical collar on tracheal intubation using Airtraq(®).

Authors:  Padmaja Durga; Chiranjeevi Yendrapati; Geeta Kaniti; Narmada Padhy; Kiran Kumar Anne; Gopinath Ramachandran
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.