Literature DB >> 19396063

Expert panel on weight loss surgery: executive report update.

George L Blackburn1, Matthew M Hutter, Alan M Harvey, Caroline M Apovian, Hannah R W Boulton, Susan Cummings, John A Fallon, Isaac Greenberg, Michael E Jiser, Daniel B Jones, Stephanie B Jones, Lee M Kaplan, John J Kelly, Rayford S Kruger, David B Lautz, Carine M Lenders, Robert Lonigro, Helen Luce, Anne McNamara, Ann T Mulligan, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Frank M Perna, Janey S A Pratt, Stancel M Riley, Malcolm K Robinson, John R Romanelli, Edward Saltzman, Roman Schumann, Scott A Shikora, Roger L Snow, Stephanie Sogg, Mary A Sullivan, Michael Tarnoff, Christopher C Thompson, Christina C Wee, Nancy Ridley, John Auerbach, Frank B Hu, Leslie Kirle, Rita B Buckley, Catherine L Annas.   

Abstract

Rapid shifts in the demographics and techniques of weight loss surgery (WLS) have led to new issues, new data, new concerns, and new challenges. In 2004, this journal published comprehensive evidence-based guidelines on WLS. In this issue, we've updated those guidelines to assure patient safety in this fast-changing field. WLS involves a uniquely vulnerable population in need of specialized resources and ongoing multidisciplinary care. Timely best-practice updates are required to identify new risks, develop strategies to address them, and optimize treatment. Findings in these reports are based on a comprehensive review of the most current literature on WLS; they directly link patient safety to methods for setting evidence-based guidelines developed from peer-reviewed scientific publications. Among other outcomes, these reports show that WLS reduces chronic disease risk factors, improves health, and confers a survival benefit on those who undergo it. The literature also shows that laparoscopy has displaced open surgery as the predominant approach; that government agencies and insurers only reimburse procedures performed at accredited WLS centers; that best practice care requires close collaboration between members of a multidisciplinary team; and that new and existing facilities require wide-ranging changes to accommodate growing numbers of severely obese patients. More than 100 specialists from across the state of Massachusetts and across the many disciplines involved in WLS came together to develop these new standards. We expect them to have far-reaching effects of the development of health care policy and the practice of WLS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396063     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2008.578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  38 in total

Review 1.  Technology for behavioral assessment and intervention in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  J Graham Thomas; Dale S Bond; David B Sarwer; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  Perioperative morbi-mortality associated with bariatric surgery: from systematic biliopancreatic diversion to a tailored laparoscopic gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy approach.

Authors:  Manuel de la Matta-Martín; Jesús Acosta-Martínez; Salvador Morales-Conde; Augusto Herrera-González
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Micronutrient-related neurologic complications following bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Ali Kazemi; Thomas Frazier; Matt Cave
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2010-08

4.  Bariatric surgery as treatment for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  George L Blackburn; Samuel B Wollner; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  A Comparative, Prospective and Randomized Evaluation of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass With and Without the Silastic Ring: A 2-Year Follow Up Preliminary Report on Weight Loss and Quality of Life.

Authors:  I Rasera; T H Coelho; M N Ravelli; M R M Oliveira; C V S Leite; L E Naresse; M A C A Henry
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 6.  Effect of bariatric surgery on oncologic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  May C Tee; Yin Cao; Garth L Warnock; Frank B Hu; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Gastric Emptying and Food Tolerance Following Banded and Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Galzuinda Maria Figueiredo Reis; Carlos Alberto Malheiros; Paulo Roberto Savassi-Rocha; Omar Lopes Cançado Júnior; Fábio Rodrigues Thuler; Mauro Lima Faria; Vicente Guerra Filho
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Understanding Eating and Exercise Behaviors in Post Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sue Benson-Davies; Michael L Davies; Kendra Kattelmann
Journal:  Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.607

9.  Feasibility and impacts of supervised exercise training in subjects with obesity awaiting bariatric surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  A Baillot; W M Mampuya; E Comeau; A Méziat-Burdin; M F Langlois
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of class III obesity: a primary target for nutrition medicine in the obesity epidemic.

Authors:  George L Blackburn; Samuel Wollner; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.