Literature DB >> 19395843

Are there patient disparities when electronic health records are adopted?

Esther Hing1, Catharine W Burt.   

Abstract

Using nationally representative samples of visits from the 2005-2006 National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (N=39,343), this study examines whether electronic health record (EHR) systems have been adopted by primary care physicians or providers (PCPs) for poor minority patients at the same rate as by the PCPs for wealthier non-minority patients. Although we found that electronic health record adoption rates varied primarily by type of practice of the PCP, we also found that uninsured Black and Hispanic or Latino patients, as well as Hispanic or Latino Medicaid patients were less likely to have PCPs using EHRs, compared with privately-insured White patients, after controlling for PCPs' practice type and location, as well as patient characteristics. This finding reflects a mixture of high and low EHR adopters among PCPs for poor minority patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19395843     DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  15 in total

1.  Are physicians' perceptions of healthcare quality and practice satisfaction affected by errors associated with electronic health record use?

Authors:  Jennifer S Love; Adam Wright; Steven R Simon; Chelsea A Jenter; Christine S Soran; Lynn A Volk; David W Bates; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Geographic variation in ambulatory electronic health record adoption: implications for underserved communities.

Authors:  Jennifer King; Michael F Furukawa; Melinda B Buntin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Health care reform and equity: promise, pitfalls, and prescriptions.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Health information technology and disparities in quality of care.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Patient portal utilization: before and after stage 2 electronic health record meaningful use.

Authors:  Kea Turner; Young-Rock Hong; Sandhya Yadav; Jinhai Huo; Arch G Mainous
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Small physician practices in new york needed sustained help to realize gains in quality from use of electronic health records.

Authors:  Andrew M Ryan; Tara F Bishop; Sarah Shih; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Get screened: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to increase mammography and colorectal cancer screening in a large, safety net practice.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Amanat Yosha; Samantha K Hendren; Sharon Humiston; Paul Winters; Pat Ford; Starlene Loader; Raymond Specht; Shirley Pope; Amna Adris; Steven Marcus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Primary Care Physicians' Use of Electronic Health Records in Rhode Island: 2009-2014.

Authors:  Sarah H Gordon; Rosa R Baier; Rebekah L Gardner
Journal:  R I Med J (2013)       Date:  2015-10-01

9.  Eliminating disparities in cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results: what will it take?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Sharon Humiston; Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Amna Idris; Patricia Ford
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-02

10.  Impact of clinical decision support on receipt of antibiotic prescriptions for acute bronchitis and upper respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  J Mac McCullough; Frederick J Zimmerman; Hector P Rodriguez
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.